Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/31/2009 6:32:15 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 08/31/2009 6:33:08 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Was the Pterosaur designed by the Intelligent Designer or created by God?


6 posted on 08/31/2009 6:45:56 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
In conclusion: "And if the transitional ancestors of pterosaurs were broken and eaten (and dead), they would not have been able to reproduce or evolve. Thus, all of their biomechanical and other specifications must have been present at the same time in the very first pterosaur."

Brian Thomas *MS gets better with age. I'm quite sure he's has a mighty chuckle every time he sees his silliness posted all over the Internet. He writes the same exact ridiculous article EVERY DAY. The quote above is so heinously devoid of any knowledge of biology, I KNOW he's kidding around.

I'll give him bonus points, though, for covering his butt by noting that even though the bible clearly says that bats are "fowl," Brian Thomas *MS notes that HE knows the bible actually meant "fowl" to mean all sorts of flying things: Birds, reptiles and mammals. He's awesome.
10 posted on 08/31/2009 6:58:37 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

I have just two questions and I will not bother you anymore with replies or debate.

Do you get paid by the hit count on these sites you continually promote?

Do you have multiple screennames here? One person in particular replies with the exact same reply, letter for letter, usually within minutes, on every thread you start.


19 posted on 08/31/2009 7:53:46 PM PDT by socialismislost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

“The claim that they evolved flight naturally, complete with their precise landing skills, defies common sense.”

GGG, you have outdone yourself, again a textbook example of an argument from personal incredulity.

You are on a roll today.

Also I fail to see any evidence in this article that supports a 6-day creation or a young earth.

Pseudoscientists often reveal themselves by their handling of the scientific literature. Their idea of doing scientific research is simply to read scientific periodicals and monographs. They focus on words, not on the underlying facts and reasoning. They take science to be all statements by scientists. Science degenerates into a secular substitute for sacred literature. Any statement by any scientist can be cited against any other statement. Every statement counts and every statement is open to interpretation. - Science and Unreason, Radner and Radner


22 posted on 08/31/2009 8:16:09 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
After reading some of the comments here it obvious that the Intelligent part of “intelligent design” just didn't take hold in these guys.

If the pterosaurs were landing without running forward, as the footprints indicate, it seem they would be quite elegant in landing and approach. It would also indicate they had enough wing strength to take off from a standing start, that sounds like a strong flyer.
Interesting article.

25 posted on 08/31/2009 8:45:39 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Common sense? What has common sense got to do with evolution? Evolution makes perfect sense, except when it doesn’t, and then we need to claim that it’s very counter-intuitiveness is proof positive that it’s real!


31 posted on 09/01/2009 5:56:33 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Oooooo.....haven't read any Brian Thomas *MS tripe in a while...

...instead of making a running landing like ducks do.

Observational note: I've never seen a duck land on anything but water....and they don't "run in"...they "water-ski in"...

Ah yes....the false conclusion:

The claim that they evolved flight naturally, complete with their precise landing skills, defies common sense. The correct wing area and shape, body weight, bone articulations,2 muscular strength and attachment points, nerve coordination—as well as integrated visual, wind, and balance detection—were all required just to make one landing. Remove or significantly alter even one feature and the poor creature would have “landed” in a heap, likely causing injury and making itself easy prey.

Deem it nonsense....therefore it must be nonsense. Dear Brian Thomas *MS seems to think that evolution theoretically occurs in one generation. Lizard walking around...lays an egg....POOF!! Pterosaur!!!

At least he used some good imagery this time.

34 posted on 09/01/2009 9:56:10 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (Didja know that Man walked with vegetarian T. rex within the last 4,351 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Yes, of course, no flying animal could possibly survive unless it could land perfectly every time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zGEbVxr0mk

(Landings in that last 30 seconds, and sorry for the inane "humorous" voiceover.)

39 posted on 09/01/2009 12:59:34 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson