Cambrian rock layers contain fossils that represent almost every modern phylum of animal, plus many that are now extinct. Well, then, if your creationist theories are correct, we should see in the Cambrian all classes under the Phylum chordata represented - you know, anything with a spinal chord - and that includes fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Instead, this is what representatives of chordata look like in the Cambrian:
Nice lying through omission, by failing to mention that most classes of the apex phyla chordata are NOT present in the Cambrian. But I've come to expect that from creationist Young Earth charlatans.
Cambrian rock layers contain fossils that represent almost every modern phylum of animal, plus many that are now extinct. All it says is that it contains fossils taht represent almost every modern phlyum of animal.
Well, then, if your creationist theories are correct, we should see in the Cambrian all classes under the Phylum chordata represented -
Why would you expect to see *all classes* under the phylum Chordata represented? By what reasoning did you arrive at that conclusion, that it would be necessary?
Nice lying through omission, by failing to mention that most classes of the apex phyla chordata are NOT present in the Cambrian.
They're lying by omission because they didn't include information that you think should have been in there?
A tad over reacting there, aren't you?