There is no serious discussion about science because your (pl) side doesn't know what science is. The evo side has tried discussing science, but are totally ignored or called atheistic liberals or worse.
Metmom, what is your science background? HS, a few college courses? You (pl) should know what you are talking about.
Example: GGG, who admits he has no science background goes on and on about non-coding DNA and has no idea about what he is talking about.
I don't get into the detailed discussions about what the bible says, because I haven't studied it. But I know molecular biology (graduate degrees) and your side doesn't know what they are talking about.
Don't expect a reply from me until tonight as I have to travel a lot today for work and will be gone. I am writing this right after I awoke.
Well you certainly showed yours.
metmom is never rude and there was no reason for you to be.
In a bid to avoid being accused of a personal attack, Wacka uses the plural form of *you* to include the creationists on this forum, so here's the courtesy ping he neglected to ping.
On the contrary, Christians and creationists have a fine idea what science is and we recognize the fraud being passed off as science when that occurs, and we call evos on it.
The evo side has tried discussing science, but are totally ignored or called atheistic liberals or worse.
But the evos calling creationists the *Christian Taliban* doesn't count? Evos are in no position to throw stones.
Metmom, what is your science background? HS, a few college courses? You (pl) should know what you are talking about.
One paragraoh in which you switch midstream from addressing me to *you* (pl), again in another desperate bid to avoid being accused of personal attacks. In a word..... Fail....
My background in science? Meteorology, graduated with a bachelors, in addition to many other science courses as I switched my major part way through my schooling.
But I know molecular biology (graduate degrees) and your side doesn't know what they are talking about.
If you've read the posts by creationists, you would know that this is patently untrue. For example, you'd find this post. I know there are others, but don't specifically recall the screen names. Likely they have been pinged in that courtesy ping that's been included in this post.
Don't expect a reply from me until tonight as I have to travel a lot today for work and will be gone. I am writing this right after I awoke.
Take your time. I understand busy.
That explains a lot.
“I think the people at the ICR might be closeted gays. I never see a picture of a hot babe in those articles you link to, only male models.”