To: allmendream; UCANSEE2; metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; ...
To: GodGunsGuts
Thank God for Irving Kristol!
To: GodGunsGuts
So ''evolution'' is no simple established scientific orthodoxy, and to teach it as such is an exercise in dogmatism. It is reasonable to suppose that if evolution were taught more cautiously, as a conglomerate idea consisting of conflicting hypotheses rather than as an unchallengeable certainty, it would be far less controversial. As things now stand, the religious fundamentalists are not far off the mark when they assert that evolution, as generally taught, has an unwarranted anti-religious edge to it.Spot on!
8 posted on
09/23/2009 3:12:29 PM PDT by
tpanther
(Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
To: GodGunsGuts
So ''evolution'' is no simple established scientific orthodoxy, and to teach it as such is an exercise in dogmatism. It is reasonable to suppose that if evolution were taught more cautiously, as a conglomerate idea consisting of conflicting hypotheses rather than as an unchallengeable certainty, it would be far less controversial. As things now stand, the religious fundamentalists are not far off the mark when they assert that evolution, as generally taught, has an unwarranted anti-religious edge to it.Spot on!
9 posted on
09/23/2009 3:12:40 PM PDT by
tpanther
(Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson