[Natural Law]

"If people believe in evolution, then they also believe that God doesn’t exist."

Reductio ad absurdum. The real argument that YEC types will not address is whether God would have created and then used a process such as evolution to bring life and man into a dynamic universe. To reject this possibility is to deny that God created the science, mathematics and laws that govern the universe.

[GourmetDan]

"The real argument that YEC types will not address is whether God would have created and then used a process such as evolution to bring life and man into a dynamic universe."

Why would God use a 'process' based on logical fallacy to 'bring life and man into a dynamic universe'?

"To reject this possibility is to deny that God created the science, mathematics and laws that govern the universe."

Fallacy of the false dilemma noted.

[tpanther]

Reductio ad absurdum. The real argument that YEC types will not address is whether God would have created and then used a process such as evolution to bring life and man into a dynamic universe. To reject this possibility is to deny that God created the science, mathematics and laws that govern the universe.

That's curious because the NEA secular humanist types have hijacked the "real argument" via the courts to ensure it never takes place in the first place.

I'd frankly love to see that very discussion take place, from k-12 on up!