Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
I seriously got a chill down my spine when I read this article for the first time. Talk about corruption! I'm also quite gratified that ICR is putting together such a good team of heavy hitters, both in terms of their staff of scientists, not to mention the people they have hired to transform their work into words that the average Joe can understand. In short, it would appear that ICR is back on the ascendancy, and I for one am quite gratified by this, since they played such a huge role in the formation of the modern creationist movement.
14 posted on 10/01/2009 9:25:08 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts

There’s been a tremendous amount of corruption in the presentation of Macroevolution, and htis corruption is taught in our schools as fact. Take hte supposed evolution of hearing for example- go to any ‘science’ book in school, and you will see a nice neat little chart, supposedly showing a nice neat little progression/movement of the jaw bone to the inner ear (supposedly). You will see skulls of water species drawn the exact same size as those of land species so that it looks like a neat little progression in similar sized skulls- but upon further research and careful exmaination- not only do supposedly millions of years seperate the ‘closest kin’, but there is a trememdous size difference too between the suppsoed ‘closest kin’- they draw a rat sized species skull the exact same size as a hippo sized skull to HIDE the fact that the supposed ‘kin’ are completely different- they make it look like there was very little difference between the two species. But mind you- this is the ‘most compelte, and best example of, evolution in action, to date’ accordign to those textbooks

As well, these books speak of how science can ‘witness evolution in action in the lab’ and they tout eukoroytes as their example, but upon further carefu lexamination- they HID the fact that the examples given were NOT one species evolving into another, as claimed, and as taught for years in school, but rather it was nothign more than a symbiotic relationship between two wholly dissimilar species- in other words, it was a parasitic invasion which developped into a symbiotic relationship where TWO seperate species thrived in conjunction with hte other- Those teaching it was ‘evolution in action’ HAD to admit finally that it is was not, and that they KNEW this all along- but taught it as fact anyways- they were caught red-handed flat out LYING to our kids- and I think you can still find textbooks making the false claim today even.

Not to mention other equally deceitful examples such as the intentionally misdrawn fetus’ development, intentional misrepresentaiton of skull fragments, misrepresentation of antibiotic resistence as ‘evolution in action’ once again- when they KNOW full well it;s nothign more than a species utilizing informaiton already present but unused- on and on it goes-

It’s funny though- watchign htem throw up their hands in feigned surprise and say ‘What? We did nothign wrong- We can’t help it if ‘mistakes’ were made- science is an ever evolving discipline where old ideas are thrown out when new info becomes available’ lol Yeah- they ‘did nothign wrong’ by intentionalyl lying and coverign up their lies (while forcing hteir lies on our kids- their motto seems to be ‘damage the kids first by feedign htem lies- then after awhile, admit ‘mistakes’ were made, but only AFTER the damage has been done)


15 posted on 10/01/2009 9:53:20 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson