Replies

So the Origin of Species thumpers have discovered an empirically verified naturalistic explanation for the origin of complex, functionally specified, digital codes?

That depends on the detail level you are expecting. The basic answer is yes.

The only empirically verified source for the same is INTELLIGENT DESIGN.

Empirically verified my ass. Just because you lie and some other idiot swears by it does not make it verified.

All attempts by the Temple of Darwin to explain the origin of DNA via naturalistic means have utterly and totally failed.

No they haven't. The problem you're having is that you expect some kind of proof or formula that arrives at exactly what we see now. That ain't gonna happen.

There is more than adequate theory and evidence to support said theory to back up naturalistic explanations for the origins of genetic codes.

That’s why your fellow Temple of Darwin fanatics expend so much effort suppressing free speech and the scientific method—because they have something to hide.

Again, ignoring stupid isn't the same as hiding something. If you've got something scientific to add to the debate then you're more than welcome to submit it for review.

When your submissions are, effectively, "God* did it" then you will be mocked, and deservedly so.

You can tell yourself whatever you like, Filo. The fact remains that the Temple of Darwin is a fanatical anti-science religion that is forced to rely on taxpayer funding, court enforcement, and outright censorship to keep their evo-religious stranglehold on the ideology of science intact. The moment your fellow evo co-religionists are forced to stand on the scientific evidence, Darwood’s materialist creation myth collapses like a house of cards. That is why your darwiniac high priests masquerading as scientists run away from the origins debate, because they know they will be utterly crushed by the ever growing mountain of evidence that falsifies Darwood’s evo-religious creation myth.

“There is more than adequate theory and evidence to support said theory to back up naturalistic explanations for the origins of genetic codes. “

Can you point me to this evidence? Thanks.