[Filo]

It’s not about dissent. There are tons of scientific dissents within evolution that constantly reshape our understanding of natural history.

There is, however, nothing of value coming from the ‘thumper camp.

They are ignored or ridiculed (I prefer the latter) for a reason.

[GodGunsGuts]

I am VERY MUCH looking forward to the day when the shoe is on the other foot.

[GodGunsGuts]

PS What do you think of Meyer's thesis in Signature in the Cell? That is, that the only empircally verified source for complex, functionally specified, digital codes (such as DNA) is intelligent design, whereas all naturalistic attempts to explain the same have utterly failed.

[GodGunsGuts]

==There are tons of scientific dissents within evolution

LOLOLOLOL!!! Way to decide what is and is not allowed to challenge Darwood’s evo-religious creation myth. That’s why the American people are rapidly starting to realize what creationists and IDers have known all along...the TEMPLE OF DARWIN IS AN EXTREMIST RELIGION AND MILITANTLY ANTI-SCIENCE.

[alstewartfan]

Filo, that’s the problem. The only dissent allowed comes from “WITHIN” Darwinist thinking. Anyone outside the box must be destroyed. Real intellectual thought going on! Darwinists, frankly, are “small and fearful men” (and women). Bob