[Filo]

Filo, that’s the problem. The only dissent allowed comes from “WITHIN” Darwinist thinking.

Not at all. There is no problem with allowing only scientific evidence and thought and with ignoring the prattling of the uneducated.

There is absolutely no reason to allow for abject stupidity in science (unless that's what you're studying.) If that weren't the case we could then start reconsidering the geocentric nature of the universe, flat Earth theories and other nonsense.

[facedown]

...the geocentric nature of the universe...

Careful, there are folks around here who actually believe that too. Sheesh.

[tpanther]

Not at all. There is no problem with allowing only scientific evidence and thought and with ignoring the prattling of the uneducated.

There is absolutely no reason to allow for abject stupidity in science (unless that’s what you’re studying.) If that weren’t the case we could then start reconsidering the geocentric nature of the universe, flat Earth theories and other nonsense.

---

I never understood how telling scurilous lies ever made your point.

But then again...it just re-enforces the fact you HAVE no point in the first place.

If these people seem “uneducated”...

www.dissentfromdarwin.org

Johns Hopkins, Princeton, MIT, then that makes perfect sense in the liberal world:

after all, down is up, up is down.