1 posted on
10/09/2009 10:26:50 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
2 posted on
10/09/2009 10:33:18 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Barack Hussein Obama: the country's greatest firearms salesman!)
To: neverdem
Three guesses why they destroyed the data, and the first two don’t count...
The data set revealed that global warming is not taking place at present, and that man is not causing climate change.
Sniff, sniff... the poor lefties... sniff sniff...
It’s about time to bring fraud charges against Al Gore and company.
3 posted on
10/09/2009 10:37:33 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
To: neverdem
...it had destroyed the raw data for its global surface temperature data set because of an alleged lack of storage space. Complete Caca de Toro. They saw the writing on the wall.
If the data had any merit, they would have been preserved for posterity in the British Museum as priceless historical artifacts in the heroic struggle against capitalism...er, against "catastrophic climate change". Sorry, I can't stop ROTFL.
4 posted on
10/09/2009 10:38:07 PM PDT by
rfp1234
To: neverdem
well ain’t that special. how many blu-ray disks would that need?
6 posted on
10/09/2009 10:44:11 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
To: neverdem
Of course they did. It is all about money and funding. I know someone who works at a research uni that is well known. They do medical research and he said it is an incredible joke. It is all about getting projects funded even though very little ever gets done. The waste and fraud are stahhering. Not blantant fraud most of the time but close. Things go on that would never happen in private industry.
8 posted on
10/09/2009 10:47:07 PM PDT by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
To: neverdem
14 posted on
10/09/2009 11:15:26 PM PDT by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: neverdem
The deep sea monitors are also being manipulated. It's an all out effort to crush American Sovereignty and destroy the means of competition and freedom.
To: neverdem
Hmm. Fixed storage now retails for about 10 cents per Gigabyte. Guess they needed the room.
19 posted on
10/09/2009 11:30:04 PM PDT by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
To: neverdem
20 posted on
10/09/2009 11:33:22 PM PDT by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: neverdem
22 posted on
10/09/2009 11:43:52 PM PDT by
OneHun
To: neverdem
Looks like I picked a bad time to stop using R-2225 posted on
10/10/2009 3:49:58 AM PDT by
egannacht
(Vote YES for statism: Why burden yourself with civic duty when Idol and Oprah are on?)
To: neverdem
“EPA’s proposal to regulate carbon dioxide.”
The fascist pigs at the EPA don’t have the constitutional authority to write law. Any so-called “law” these dictators write must be ignored. Any person or entity that supports this usurpation of the law must be educated. Unelected bureaucrats writing law is tyranny and the tool of dictators. Every foul snake in the criminal EPA must be indicted for sedition and punished.
28 posted on
10/10/2009 5:16:43 AM PDT by
sergeantdave
(obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
To: neverdem
Al Gore: "But manbearpig really exists, I swear. Trust me, you don't want to ignore the existence of the manbearpig. The future of the earth depends on it. This is cereal."
29 posted on
10/10/2009 6:11:01 AM PDT by
NotSoModerate
(Obama's spin isn't ordinary, it's roller coaster ride after a few beers spin.)
To: neverdem
In a declaration filed with CEI’s petition, Cato Institute scholar and climate scientist Patrick Michaels calls CRU’s revelation “a totally new element” that “violates basic scientific principles, and “throws even more doubt” on the claims of global warming alarmists. Odd, I have no doubt about the claims of the global warming alarmists...it's clear their studies are full of craptastic lies. All this clears up is that they know it as well or they wouldn't have destroyed the data to hide that fact.
32 posted on
10/10/2009 11:43:31 AM PDT by
highlander_UW
(To anger a conservative tell him a lie. To anger a liberal tell him the truth.)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
34 posted on
10/11/2009 7:14:57 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: neverdem
Huh? Is that some kind of joke? I could set up 20 Gigs of network attached storage for $10,000 comprised of 5 3-Drive Raid 5 arrays using 2gb disks.
36 posted on
10/11/2009 10:55:35 PM PDT by
rmlew
(Democracy tends to ignore..., threats to its existence because it loathes doing what is needed)
To: neverdem
... because of an alleged lack of storage space.Riggghhhhht.
37 posted on
10/12/2009 3:27:24 AM PDT by
LiberConservative
("Sarah Palin irritates all the right people." -Dennis Miller)
To: neverdem
The just released emails of Phil Jones make it fairly obvious what really happened here.
To: neverdem
This is a blatant lie. Data storage is cheap and abundant. They were not cleaning up files for storage space. THEY WERE DESTROYING EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
39 posted on
11/22/2009 8:42:46 AM PST by
cpdiii
(roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
