[fabian]

After many years and so so many fossils dug up, still no clear transitional fossils of one animal type into another. If there were, evolutiion macro would have been proven totally long ago. It stays alive only as a fantasy in the thoughts of those possessed by a spirit in hatred of God. Those unwitting dupes do not know that.

[NoGrayZone]

"After many years and so so many fossils dug up, still no clear transitional fossils of one animal type into another. If there were, evolution macro would have been proven totally long ago. It stays alive only as a fantasy in the thoughts of those possessed by a spirit in hatred of God. Those unwitting dupes do not know that."

Darwin also said fossils would prove it to be true. However, all evidence thus-far just proves him wrong. Some also indicate a "burst of life" from nothing.

[Ira_Louvin]

The scientists who have spent the past decade pouring over Ardi's fragmented skeleton believe she walked upright and that her teeth resemble modern human teeth more closely than they do those of a chimpanzee. Though they do not believe Ardi is a direct ancestor of humans or the long-sought "missing link," paleontologists say she helps show that both human beings and apes evolved from a common ancestor about 6 million years ago, that did not look much like either. Ardi, paleontologists say, was capable of grasping, something chimps need in order to climb in trees, but likely did not swing from branches the way modern chimps do.

So this fossil shows chartists of modern humans and apes, then how is this not a transitional fossil?

[Soothesayer]

Should I even bother explaining the science or did you already make up your mind?