[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

fyi

[2banana]

But will they ever find obama’s birth certificate?

[Sacajaweau]

And would that make us 5 million years older?

[mnehring]

That means that instead of forming between 428 and 418 million years ago, the rocks actually formed between 428 and 426 million years ago.

In the big picture of things, that seems like a pretty small recalibration.

[colorado tanker]

Silurian

Shu timesh when animalsh had twoubble shpeeking.

[Red Badger]

Rock of ages, cleft from me.........................

[xcamel]

It’s not old until it Grenville old.

[mountainlion]

Evolutionists/Darwinists will not be happy. Looks like Dr. Dino was right.

[hellbender]

From the linked article:

Ultimately, the geologists hope to perform similar studies of rock from other time periods, to better pinpoint periods of global climate change in Earth's history.

Associating your research with today's "climate change" fad is a sure way of improving your chances of getting a grant. That may be a factor in the desperate need of the scientific establishment to continue the hysteria. However, notice another quote:

During times of apparent rapid climate change at other locations around the globe

which clearly indicates that rapid change has occurred long before there were people to blame it on.

[CharlesWayneCT]

OK, I know the evos will say this doesn’t matter, that 100 million is still a long long time.

But if creationists said 6000 years, and evolutionists said 400 million years, and it turns out it was 100 million years, the evolutionists were off by more than 300 million years, the creationists off by less than 100 million years, so the creationists were a lot closer to being right than the evolutionists.

And if something as “basic” as the age of rocks could be off by a factor of 4, maybe it’s off by more.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Ernest! Fred, "Earth in Upheaval" time...

· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·