Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry

Try finding any science on the other side.


15 posted on 10/27/2009 8:43:12 AM PDT by FormerRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: FormerRep; G Larry
(Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, p. 116 (Regnery, 2000).)Archaeopteryx isn’t the only evolutionary icon losing its claim as the ancestor of birds. In recent months we’ve seen paleontologists increasingly arguing that the entire clade of dinosaurs should no longer be considered ancestral to birds.

Is this inaccurate?

17 posted on 10/27/2009 8:45:59 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: FormerRep
The scientific support for creation are the myriad of broken theories and attempts to explain away creation, using half-assed extrapolations that simply don't hold together.
Pretending that adaptation within a species explains transition from one species to another.
Then reverting to redefining species to rationalize the the phony stories.
Watching over the decades as charlatans attempt to use evolution to explain away God.
As though we're here by accident and without purpose....
52 posted on 10/27/2009 11:13:24 AM PDT by G Larry (DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson