Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
No Evolution in 58 Million Years

Really?

Explain bacterial resistance to the Sulfonamides which was zero in the 1930's and is about 99% now.

Explain bacterial resistance to the Penicilloic Acid derivatives which was zero in the 1940's and is about 59% now.

You could argue that it is God intervening on a daily basis, but that seems a bit extreme, and He has bigger fish to fry.

Let science be science, let faith be faith.

The more I have studied science (three college degrees now) the more I see God's face.

ALL this did not just happen, or maybe it did, but God's subtle hand is involve either way.

I believe that people that try to use science to justify their faith, don't have faith, and are doubting themselves. Embrace your faith, embrace science, they both pay homage to the Creator.

20 posted on 10/31/2009 5:13:16 PM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mikey_1962

It is a frontloaded capacity to adapt to changing enviroments. I have to get ready to Trunk or Treat, but when I get back, I would be glad to explore bacterial resistance with you. I am curious, though. If Creation/ID provides a better explanation for bacterial resistance, will you have a more open mind about looking into science from a Creation/ID perspective?


22 posted on 10/31/2009 5:19:52 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Mikey_1962
Let science be science, let faith be faith.

Exactly, which is why it begs the question why so many liberals demand people that have faith in God be kept silent on the subject of His creation and intelligent design of the world and universe around us, scientifically speaking.

The more I have studied science (three college degrees now) the more I see God's face.

Which also begs the question, who gave liberals and the NEA/ACLU the keys to science to silence all those who dissent with materialistic/natural godless versions of science?

ALL this did not just happen, or maybe it did, but God's subtle hand is involve either way.

Exactly, so again, why give into the liberal demands to squash your very own views from the public realm and public education?

I believe that people that try to use science to justify their faith, don't have faith, and are doubting themselves.

Precisely...so again, it takes an enormous amount of faith to demand that all people see or view science without God, somehow sterilizing Him from His own creation (see my tagline).

Embrace your faith, embrace science, they both pay homage to the Creator.

Why must they be kept separate as if science somehow is off limits to God or vice-versa? I always have and I'm not about to stop now just because liberals find it "offensive". Liberals want conservatives to keep quiet about the design and intelligence they see...or the face of God as you put it, and that would not only do a disservice to the science, but also sadden God that He would be seen as "offensive" just because liberals don't want to recognize Him scientifically.

85 posted on 11/02/2009 8:37:48 AM PST by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson