Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS
No. I just think it shows how effective the “soft” scientists have been in turning we “hard” scientists into jelly out of fear of rejection and less funding. The educational system today is wholly under your control, and it has produced this amazing turnaround from scrutiny of the facts to scrutiny of the person and/or social effects of the results.
7 posted on 11/12/2009 11:59:46 PM PST by VanShuyten ("Do you call it 'unsound method'?" "No method at all," I murmured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: VanShuyten

Well I think we economist know certain things just as biologists, chemists etc know certain things. Each science would probably be better off if it stuck to teaching what it knows and investigating what it does not know. To often the what it knows is not the focus of the classroom or other communication with the public. Global warming is just one such example.


8 posted on 11/13/2009 12:07:50 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson