Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Excellent. This is probably the best single article yet, because the writer understands that the basic methodologies of science are being violated in every direction, and puts it all together beautifully.

No question that this whole thing was a fraud, which was performed deliberately and followed by a deliberate coverup, in the interests of fame, fortune, and lots of government gravy.

Sure, it’s ideological as well. The perps are all leftists. But it’s ideological in the same way that Lenin was ideological. They did it in order to acquire power and control and wealth, with a thin veneer of doing it all “for the people” or “for the planet.”


5 posted on 11/21/2009 10:41:27 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

The one gnawing problem I still have with this hacking of computer files is the small number of emails over a ten year period.

“”More than a decade of correspondence between leading British and U.S. scientists is included in about 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents posted on Web sites following the security breach last week.””

My own explanation for such a few number of emails is that this was an inside job and the person who blew the whistle had collected the most damaging emails and only made those public.

If that is not the case, then there should have been 10,000 to 100,000 emails during the past 10 years-—not 1,000.


9 posted on 11/21/2009 10:58:45 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson