Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike
". . that fewer troops mean assuming more risk. Talk of an exit date also risks sending the wrong message. We should be in Afghanistan to win, not to set a timetable for withdrawal that signals a lack of resolve to our friends, and lets our enemies believe they can wait us out. As long as we’re in to win, and as long as troop level decisions are based on conditions on the ground and the advice of our military commanders, I support President Obama’s decision.

Perfect. Political savant Sarah makes a statement that can be used later to "call him on it" when he fails. She never ceases to amaze me.

79 posted on 12/01/2009 8:24:48 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Art in Idaho

I have a questions for Sarah - which military commanders recommended an 18-month timetable for Afghanistan? I think she came across as sounding, dare I say, a politician, on this one.


100 posted on 12/01/2009 8:42:14 PM PST by WillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson