Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

>Darwin attempted to give his “theory” of evolution the deep time it needed by hitching it to lyellian uniformitarianism, which is rapidly being discredited along with Darwin’s evo-atheist creation myth.

As usual, you have no clue of what you are talking about.

Evolution was a concept that was debated since the time of the Greek philosophers and not a theory of Darwin.

Your claim of Darwin attempting to give evolution “deep time,” is a complete fabrication, this is, a lie that has no basis in fact.

Uniformitarianism, just like any other legitimate scientific theory, is continually subject to scrutiny. It is no big deal.

What Charles Darwin did in fact was to take along Charles Lyell’s book, “Principles of Geology,” which among other things demonstrated through the observing of irregularities in rock layers, that Earth’s sediments were not laid down at a single time from a biblical flood as previously believed, but was instead a process that had took hundreds of millions of years.

Radiometric dating and stratigraphy verify this. Since the science of Physics underlies this, and God created everything in the Universe, including the law of physics, anyone one denying this data is denying the existence of God.

Again, your accusing Darwin of proposing a “evo-athiest creation myth” is complete fabrication on your part, another lie.

You blame Darwin, but it is you who are truly evil, continually spouting out misinformation and hate.

George


19 posted on 12/02/2009 8:20:54 PM PST by George - the Other ("Saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent" - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: George - the Other
"As usual, you have no clue of what you are talking about........You blame Darwin, but it is you who are truly evil, continually spouting out misinformation and hate." I am disappointed but not surprised by the Lenninist tactics used to try to discredit science with an endless sream of lies posted as naseum. It is important for both God and science that we continue to correct the continuous stream of falsehoods presented in these threads.

("A lie told often enough becomes the truth." Vladimir Lenin)

21 posted on 12/02/2009 8:34:53 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: George - the Other

==As usual, you have no clue of what you are talking about.

As usual, you have accused someone else of what you yourself are guilty of. The rest is ignored because, as usual, you didn’t write anything worth responding to. But if you ever get around to making specific arguments, I would be glad to engage your easily falsified evo-religion any time you are feeling up to the challenge.

—GGG


22 posted on 12/02/2009 8:47:38 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: George - the Other
Just how do you determine who is “truly evil”?
40 posted on 12/02/2009 9:34:43 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: George - the Other; GodGunsGuts

Good post ...

Missing in this thread is the fact that Chapter IX in Darwin’s “Origin of Species” is titled “On the Imperfection of the Geological Record.”

And now, in Steve Jones’ “Darwin’s Ghost,” subtitled “The Origin of Species - Updated,” Jones writes in his same titled chapter ...

“Geology assuredly does not reveal any finely graduated organic chain, and this is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against the theory of evolution” ... and ... “The archive of the rocks is a series of snapshots, taken at long intervals with a badly focused camera.”

Jones goes further in his Chapter IX by revealing the extent geological knowledge has increased since Darwin.

The current accepted age of the Earth, for instance, is based on moon rocks collected on Apollo missions.


42 posted on 12/02/2009 9:36:58 PM PST by OldNavyVet ("... where ignorance is bliss, tis folly to be wise." -- Thomas Gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: George - the Other

Yet another who would look at the Word of God, read it, and then declare God a liar, based on the works of man. Prayers up for George - The Other.


60 posted on 12/03/2009 6:41:48 AM PST by RoadGumby (Ask me about Ducky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson