[stormer]

So because Darwin misinterpreted a geomorphological process, you want to throw out the last 150 years of biological science?

[Asfarastheeastisfromthewest...]

So because Darwin misinterpreted a geomorphological process, you want to throw out the last 150 years of biological science?

The last 150 years of biological science were a test case precursor to the last 10 years of climatology science....

[GodGunsGuts]

Darwin attempted to give his “theory” of evolution the deep time it needed by hitching it to lyellian uniformitarianism, which is rapidly being discredited along with Darwin’s evo-atheist creation myth.

[Gordon Greene]

“So because Darwin misinterpreted a geomorphological process, you want to throw out the last 150 years of biological science?”

Your question amuses me. Your 150 years of “biological science” is no more sound in it’s conclusions than those of the global warming Nazi’s. Hide the data, folks... Darwin-Gate is only a hacker away.

Wait. That’s not right. The lack of evidence for Evolution screams louder and is much more far-reaching than a few emails belonging to a gaggle of stilted climatologists.

[Moonman62]

So because Darwin misinterpreted a geomorphological process, you want to throw out the last 150 years of biological science?

Of course. That's why the the anti-science crowd attacks Darwin in a field that's not his specialty, instead of attacking the works of people like Ronald Fisher and Edmund Ford that made natural selection accepted science.

[tacticalogic]

So because Darwin misinterpreted a geomorphological process, you want to throw out the last 150 years of biological science?

It's an exercise in "freedom of religion". To some, that means "borking the heretics".