[ElectricStrawberry]

This is the “defense of religious freedom”??

I see they’re looking at sciencey stuff and baselessly claiming it’s false because it doesn’t fit the Bible....looks like an attack on your religiou freedom to me.

I see another attack on a scientifically based hypothesis, using the Bible...baselessly claiming the science fits the Bible in a ludicrous comparison that is merely small world skin-deep thinking. That must be “defending religious freedom.”

I see quote mining of commentary of a research paper...this must be “defending religious freedom.”

I see the wiping out of an entire field of science...of course that’s “defending religious freedom.”

I see the perversion of entomology and microbiology to match the Bible... must be “defending religious freedom.”

Someone deserves a medal for all this “defending” going on.

[Buck W.]

It’s not so much “defending religious freedom” as it is “throwing a life preserver to those of weak faith who would be lost if their belief in the literal truth of the bible were shaken by science”.

Of course, that would take longer to type.

[Natural Law]

"This is the “defense of religious freedom”??"

It is exactly the opposite. I see the continued posts by GodlessGunlessGutless as an undisguised assault on the religious freedom of Catholics and other who do not believe in Young Earth Creationism. He is the epitome of the Christian Taliban.