>>oooooo boy... one of these looney psuedo-science groupies pushing evolution...<<
Quote the masochist, aren’t you? It is like “I DON’T UNDERSTAND SCIENCE SO I WILL KEEP EMPHASIZING THAT SO PEOPLE CAN PITY ME” in neon on your forehead.
If you have a SCIENTIFIC alternative to TToE that explains the BILLIONS of data, including MILLIONS of reproducible experiments and MILLIONS of observed examples — now is the time. Remember, if you can’t account for all of you have failed.
Meet the challenge or say goodnight Gracie.
You’ve OD’d again!
Their is no naturalistic explanation that can explain the creation of the vast amounts of information contained with the DNA code. Evolution has only two tools: Natural Selection and Random Mutations. Natural Selection works great at selecting the most fit from within the existing genetic variation - but that leads to a net loss of information over time as genetic variation is lost. Mutations can change the dna code but those changes simply make portions of the dna unreadable - sometimes this can convey a benefit (ie a “superbug” that loses the ability to create an enzyme which an antibiotic had been intended to interact with to kill the bacteria.) However, losing the information which allowed the bacteria to create an enzyme is still a loss of information. Scientists have never been able to present a true example of mutations creating new genetic information. Thus evolution has no explanation for the creation of the vast amounts of information needed to get from a single cell Organism to man. Not to mention that Evolution has no explenation for how life could have been created in the first place.
Creationist Scientists make some very rational arguments on these lines. So please save me your sarcastic comments comparing Creation Science and Intelligent Design to Astrology. Your elitist dismissal of your opponents is worthy of a Climate Chance Elitist not a true scientist.