Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Kirk
"...If you are worried about the U.S. returning it, perhaps you should raise bloody hell about the efforts of the U.S. installed pro-Iran Iranian government in Iraq to develop its own nuclear program..."

Canada is already reprocessing it for peaceful purposes, so I'm not worried—at all.

WRT Iraq's nuclear program, I'd say that was "dead in the water"...

1) as long as Iraq has oil ten-years out...

2) until Iran's nukes are destroyed.

"...All that uranium (buried in barrels) dated from before 1991, not from Saddam's mythical nuclear program of the early 2000s..."

Uranium doesn't wear out. Saddam's friends would omit saying the 500 TONS of Uranium would be in Iran's hands right now. (Like Saddam's jet fighters).

P.S.: I read the article, and am not concerned.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/iraq-war/news/article.cfm?c_id=590&objectid=10605996&pnum=1

35 posted on 12/11/2009 1:28:37 AM PST by Does so (ObamaCare...I pay for medical-marijuana claims by millions of Americans?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Does so
Uranium doesn't wear out. Saddam's friends would omit saying the 500 TONS of Uranium would be in Iran's hands right now. (Like Saddam's jet fighters).

What are you talking about? Are you arguing that the U.S. installed pro-Iran Shi'ite government in Iraq would have given the uranimum to Iran? Saddam and the Iranians hated each other. In fact, it was Khomeini, not Bush, who was the first person to call for regime change in Baghdad.

36 posted on 12/11/2009 7:50:34 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson