1 posted on
12/16/2009 4:39:49 PM PST by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: decimon
says a new study published Wednesday to show the effects of global warming. I'll tell you all abouts the effects of global warming. It grows crops in the summertime and causes birds to migrate in the winter.
And at least one time, it cleared giant glaciers that covered much of North America. Man is not the fault and there is no "cure" to this non-existent "threat".
2 posted on
12/16/2009 4:42:29 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
To: decimon; steelyourfaith; SunkenCiv
3 posted on
12/16/2009 4:42:33 PM PST by
decimon
To: decimon
Without SUVs? What did the polar bears do?
4 posted on
12/16/2009 4:42:57 PM PST by
uscabjd
To: decimon
There was no human produced CO2 125,000 years ago so that does nothing to advance their preposterous AGW claims.
Actually it undercuts their specious arguments that man is altering the climate.
5 posted on
12/16/2009 4:44:08 PM PST by
Yankee
(Welcome to Obama's Fourth Reich.)
To: decimon
The pictures coming out lately of Al Gore, looked like he had climaxed about 125,000 years ago as well..
6 posted on
12/16/2009 4:44:59 PM PST by
JoanneSD
To: decimon
[Goes to back door}
[Fires up GPS]
Yep, altitude still >> ~25 ft.
No problem here.
7 posted on
12/16/2009 4:45:49 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: decimon
“Sea levels were likely eight metres higher around 125,000 years”
See, that’s why prehistoric cave men had that big meeting in copenhagen (rockenhagen, as it was known then) where they decided to shut down all power plants, outlaw suv’s, and revert back to a hunter-gatherer lifestyle.
...I won’t bother with the /sarc tag, that will just insult everyone’s intelligence.
8 posted on
12/16/2009 4:46:09 PM PST by
AussieJoe
To: decimon
"Sea levels were likely eight metres higher around 125,000 years ago when polar temperatures were 3-5 degrees C warmer, says a new study published Wednesday to show the effects of global warming. "
The fact that Harvard Professors are dribbling this garbage, coupled with fact that barack obama is a product of Harvard, haa done more damage to the Harvard "mystique" than any other scandal could have done.
125,000 years ago, and that one, isolated, random event shows the effects of "hoaxtal warming"?
About five years ago I dropped a penny into that water tank thing in Taco Bell and it landed on one of those little ledges, and I won a free soft drink...wow, that just proves it....(proves what, I don't know, but it's just about as stupid as this thread).
Grabbing at straws and splitting hairs does not "de-hoax" climate change...it is, what it is and the toothpaste cannot be put back in the tube.
algore...go home and take up basket weaving, or some other inmate type hobby...later - if you're a good boy - there will be ice cream.
9 posted on
12/16/2009 4:49:59 PM PST by
FrankR
(oBAMA: I'd rather pay higher premiums and live, than sit before your Death Panels and die.)
To: decimon
10 posted on
12/16/2009 4:51:49 PM PST by
boomop1
To: decimon
“Sea levels were likely eight metres higher around 125,000 years ago when polar temperatures were 3-5 degrees C warmer, says a new study published Wednesday to show the effects of global warming. “
Stupid Stone Age Republicans and their gas hog rock wheels.
I knew Fred and Barney were greedy Hummer drivers!
11 posted on
12/16/2009 4:53:22 PM PST by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: decimon
PARIS (AFP) Sea levels were likely eight metres higher around 125,000 years ago when polar temperatures were 3-5 degrees C warmer, says a new study published Wednesday to show the effects of global warming.
Well, I'm glad to hear that. Now I know for sure that Anthropogenic Global Warming is a total "non-starter"... :-)
I mean, if they had this kind of "Global Warming" back then without factories and SUVs and all the stuff pouring into the atmosphere, then I know for sure that Anthropogenic Global Warming is a total hoax... :-)
But, yes... "Global Warming" is real.... it's just that man has nothing to do with it..
OH..., and by the way... during the Medieval Warm Period, when things were a lot warmer than now, Holland didn't flood or get inundated. So, the way I see it, the sea is not going to rise, this time either -- all the way through as warm as it got during the Medieval Warm Period, which was a lot warmer than now...
12 posted on
12/16/2009 4:55:58 PM PST by
Star Traveler
(The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
To: decimon
13 posted on
12/16/2009 5:08:41 PM PST by
Track9
(The Levin surge is on.)
To: decimon
“At the time, polar temperatures were 3-5 degrees C (37-41 degrees F) higher than today....”
.
Whoa hoss — a difference of 5 degrees C is equivalent to a difference of 9 degrees F.
17 posted on
12/16/2009 5:17:37 PM PST by
353FMG
(Save the Planet -- Eliminate Socialism)
To: decimon
Of course this bit of news is corroborated by geological evidence... oh sorry.
Not to mention that the Earth had been in a long term cooling trend beginning some 1.7 million years prior (the Pleistocene Epoch) and culminating in the kilometers thick northern and southern ice caps.
19 posted on
12/16/2009 5:40:21 PM PST by
PIF
To: decimon
To understand the potential effects of a rise in temperature, the researchers reexamined data about the last interglacial stage -- a warmer period within an ice age -- which climaxed about 125,000 years ago, they said. At the time, polar temperatures were 3-5 degrees C (37-41 degrees F) higher than today, providing a comparison for current scenarios of future rises of 1-2 degrees C, they said. Further analysis showed that polar bears went extinct during that period, that the human race was wiped out, and that 80% of the plant and animal species we know were permanently destroyed by the massive heat wave. Oh, wait; that couldn't be true. Polar bears are still here - drowning as the ice melts but still here. People are still around too, somehow. Exactly what damage is global warming supposed to do so that temperatures in my home town warming up to the normal highs for 60 miles south of my town will somehow destroy the world, yet the world with all species alive today survived a change three times as large during the previous interglacial?
27 posted on
12/16/2009 6:26:38 PM PST by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: decimon; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
29 posted on
12/16/2009 7:58:35 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
To: decimon
Sea rose eight metres in warmer age: study
I wonder if this is what caused that ancient high shoreline visible along the north coast of the Dominican Republic between Nagua and Sosua.
31 posted on
12/16/2009 8:01:43 PM PST by
aruanan
To: decimon; SunkenCiv
%@&#!&# Flinstones and their SUV’s made of wood and rocks.
36 posted on
12/16/2009 9:37:56 PM PST by
uglybiker
(BACON!!)
To: decimon
Is this one of those ALGOREISMS?
25 more feet of water would make living in costal regions a little more difficult.
38 posted on
12/17/2009 4:44:15 AM PST by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: decimon
I say BS!
If I'm not mistaken, most of the Antarctic is a floating ice mass.
Fill a glass with water and ice to the brim and when the ice melts you still only have a glass filled to the brim with water. It does not overflow....
41 posted on
12/17/2009 9:21:38 AM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(I want a hoochie-mama for Christmas, only a hoochie-mama will do............)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson