 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Watch what spotted algore does with his money. I’ll bet a buck that he is quietly removing all his funding for companies that stand to make a bundle over globull warming.
Did you know that a rotting log in a forest releases as much CO2 as is released by burning that log in a fireplace? Only difference is, the process is sped up when burning, which also results in the release of useful energy an opposed to no energy realized by letting the wood rot.
The climate commies will never stop their lies until they accomplish the enslavement of mankind.
Not a single warmer that I know of claims that. What many warmers claim is that 100% of the increase in CO2 (since about 1850) is from manmade sources. This is also wrong from a variety of analyses, not the least of which is the fact that natural fluctuations dominate CO2.
For example, CO2 was higher in mid 2006 than in late 2008, a period of thirty months. Granted that period coincides with a seasonal high (mid year) and seasonal low (end of year). But it shows that natural fluctuations outweigh the manmade amounts.
If any warmer claims that 100% of the CO2 increase comes from manmade sources, ask him/her for the math that shows that.
We should be running CO2 from our power plants into Algae oil growers. Then we would get a double benefit from electrical power from fossil fuels.
thanks Kaslin.
No rise in atmospheric carbon fraction over the last 150 years: University of Bristol
Hot Air | 8:48 am on January 4, 2010 | Ed Morrissey
Posted on 01/05/2010 2:43:42 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2421722/posts
|
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
That would dry up the ole CO2 cash cow for AlBore!
“A major tenet of the global warming religion, straight from the Book of Gore, has been that the ability of the earth to handle increasing CO2 emissions is finite and that once the “tipping point” is reached, the earth will warm uncontrollably.”
The earth has been recycling carbon for a very long time, to which carbonaceous sedimentary formations are testimony. Greenhouse gases have been described by meteorologists, long before global warming, as one of many mechanisms by which the atmosphere stays in equilibrium. Goremania would have it that CO2 in the atmosphere acts like an energy sponge, sopping up the long wave radiation that would otherwise be lost to space. CO2 absorbs at some very specific wavelengths in the infra-red spectrum (that’s how it is detected nowadays), but soon re-radiates that energy (not at the same wavelength) as it returns to its original energy level. So it may slow up some energy in that form, hence its greenhouse parity, but by no means hangs on to it. This CO2, being such a minute percentage of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (and the ‘man-made’ portion is maybe 3% of that while H2O is all but ignored), it is almost laughable that it has become the basis of ‘settled’ scientific projections of imminent doom.
They WHY ain't IT hot!!!!!
Yeah that'll fly. My parents are died in the wool libs and they can smell a conservative perspective a mile away, and they reject it.
