Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Elect: No National Health Care Plan (Scott Brown Alert!)
politico ^ | January 20, 2010 | Ben Smith

Posted on 01/20/2010 9:47:55 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion

In a low-key and conciliatory first appearance as Senator-elect, Scott Brown appeared to rule out any compromise on a national health care plan, suggesting instead that the question be returned to the states and that Massachusetts, which covers 98 percent of its residents, be a "model."

"We already have 98 percent of our people insured here," Brown said. "The one size fits all plan that is being pushed nationally — it doesn’t work."

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; obamacare; politics; scottbrown; senate

1 posted on 01/20/2010 9:47:58 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
What Brown means health care is a state matter. A one size fits all plan won't work for the country.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

2 posted on 01/20/2010 9:50:00 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Suggesting MA’s plan is good: -1
Suggesting it’s a state, not federal issue: +3

Overall: +2


3 posted on 01/20/2010 9:52:00 AM PST by RockinRight (The sleeping giant has been awoken, and he's PISSED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I’ll take it. He’s not going to knock Romneycare b/c he voted for it and Myth is his backer. Notice how little the dims care about heathcare at the state level? They only care about it on the national level as means to maintain power.


4 posted on 01/20/2010 9:55:00 AM PST by Lou Budvis (She never bankrupted Alaska or bowed to royalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Massachusetts wanted to protect its plan from federal interference. It may or may not be a good plan but states are closer to the problem than the federal government will ever be and every state faces unique health care challenges. These aren't going to be solved by bureaucrats in Washington.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

5 posted on 01/20/2010 9:55:51 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Isn’t Mass going broke?


6 posted on 01/20/2010 10:00:28 AM PST by Hildy (This Christmas, the Democrats have given America the one gift that keeps on taking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Yes, but it’s better for a state to go broke than the federal government. States do not have money printing presses and they are directly responsible for their own spending.

Brown is approaching this with exactly the correct and Constitutional approach: there is no Constitutional authority for the Federal government to get involved in healthcare, period.

If states want to dabble in universal coverage and possibly go broke doing it, fine, have at it.


7 posted on 01/20/2010 10:12:58 AM PST by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

But won’t we wind up paying for it when Massachusetts can’t make a payroll?


8 posted on 01/20/2010 10:16:00 AM PST by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

I absolutely agree with you. I was just asking about how Universal Health Care is effecting Massachusetts. I was thinking, if I get some kind of terrible illness, could I just move to Massachusetts and be taken care of?


9 posted on 01/20/2010 10:16:19 AM PST by Hildy (This Christmas, the Democrats have given America the one gift that keeps on taking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: woweeitsme

Not if the Federal Government once again stays inside its Constitutional boundaries and refuses to subsidize profligate state spending.

Although I have not heard Senator Brown address this specifically, I would venture a confident guess that he opposes federal bailouts of bankrupt states.


10 posted on 01/20/2010 10:21:27 AM PST by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
What Brown means health care is a state matter. A one size fits all plan won't work for the country.

I hope Senator-elect Brown is consistent on state rights and he is not using the argument to "cherry pick" which issue he does not want to engage in. To his credit, he has used State Rights on gay marriage and abortion and rigorously campaigned about the few things the federal government should be doing.

11 posted on 01/20/2010 10:30:48 AM PST by 11th Commandment (History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I believe you are correct, and if that’s what Brown does mean then I agree totally. I am a firm believer that the majority of what constitutes the obesity of the Fed belongs to the States, and is theirs to toss, or to find means in which to handle the costs themselves.

We as a Nation are in trouble today because we allowed the Socialists too much leeway to play at their idealogical voodoo, Centralized form of government for too long. They should have been shut down, and shown the light long ago.

Hello Leftists! This is The United States of America. Here’s a copy of our Constitution. Kindly sit down, shut up, and read. If you have any questions, just raise your hand, and we’ll be happy to enlighten you.

Shutting up would be the hardest part for the Leftist, but reading about Freedom will be a close second with their eyes glazing incessently glazing over. Freedom to them is just another word.


12 posted on 01/20/2010 10:33:08 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

He should have the guts to say Masscare isn’t working and is totally bankrupting the state, and THAT is why national healthcare will fail.

It isn’t a states rights issue. It’s not ANY government’s issue (state or national). Getting government involved as partial or primary payer has totally screwed up the cost structure of medical procedures. And thus, insurance premiums.


13 posted on 01/20/2010 10:35:47 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Brown is exactly right. It is a state issue and if a state feels they can provide healthcare for all their residence then they should have the right to have it voted on.


14 posted on 01/20/2010 10:39:41 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

The Libs woke up this morning and realized that it wasn’t a nightmare but reality. Have a nice day, Libs, enjoy reality.


15 posted on 01/20/2010 11:49:18 AM PST by JPG (Mr. Gore, we have a warrant for your arrest...put your hands behind your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson