Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

These rotten commie liars need to be given a last smoke and a bullet.
1 posted on 01/22/2010 9:29:15 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pissant; xcamel; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; steelyourfaith; NormsRevenge; Oynx

Absolutely!


2 posted on 01/22/2010 9:34:19 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
I was checking on the reaction to this farce over at RealClimate.org and came across this gem:

27
rosie hughes says:
19 January 2010 at 8:04 PM

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, all this fixation on get-it-right, got-it-wrong is obscuring the real issue: the truth is what we define it to be, and the truth is that mankind is a scourge on the planet. The sooner we can limit the right to breed, the sooner the planet will recover. If glacier data is a little incorrect but helps that effort, then the data is true in all but a very narrow and clinical scientific sense.

Common people don’t really understand science. But they understand not having enough to eat and not being able to sit down on a too-crowded subway. if we can educate people not to reproduce there will be many seats and the fewer people will be happier. Indeed, as the capitalist economies of scale are reduced, the [s]atisfaction from making your own clothes and embracing a low-carbon vegan diet will be so intense, reproduction will come to be seen in the same category as child abuse.

I yearn for the day when i might not have been born!

3 posted on 01/22/2010 10:33:29 PM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Isn't this the criminal head of the UN IPCC whose company is reaping million$ as a direct result of the scientific global warming fraud which is both the only source of 'anthropogenic' global warming science that the UN will accept, AND the users of the fraudulent data as the foundation of every IPCCC report of the last 20 years?

A clearer conflict of interest cannot be found, and the arrogance and chutzpah displayed by this criminal cannot be overstated.
The fraud and corruption equals or may dwarf the previous UN corruption champ, the "food for oil" grand larceny.

Why isn't this crook in jail yet?

6 posted on 01/23/2010 12:55:56 AM PST by Publius6961 (He is not America; he is an employee seemingly unable to rise to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
"We have a very clear idea of what is happening," the chairman of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) told the Guardian newspaper. "I don't know why the minister is supporting this unsubstantiated research. It is an extremely arrogant statement." Then again, when it comes to unsubstantiated research it's hard to beat the IPCC, whose 2007 report insisted that the glaciers... were very likely to nearly disappear by the year 2035... It turns out that this widely publicized prediction was taken from a 2005 report from the World Wildlife Fund, which based it on a comment by Indian glacier expert Syed Hasnain from 1999. Mr. Hasnian now says he was "misquoted." Even more interesting is that the IPCC was warned in 2006 by leading glaciologist Georg Kaser that the 2035 forecast was baseless. "This number is not just a little bit wrong, but far out of any order of magnitude," Mr. Kaser told the Agence France-Presse. "It is so wrong that it is not even worth discussing."
Well said, pissant. Thanks Ernest for the ping.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

11 posted on 01/23/2010 6:58:29 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

The funny thing is that this IPCCC guy is an engineer, a railroad engineer.


13 posted on 01/23/2010 7:51:31 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Pray for my soul. More things are wrought by prayer Than this world dreams of.-- Idylls of the King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
"We have a very clear idea of what is happening," the chairman of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) told the Guardian newspaper. "I don't know why the minister is supporting this unsubstantiated research. It is an extremely arrogant statement."

How ironic he says what skeptics have been saying all along about the IPCC.

IPCC is now in circle the wagons mode. Defending themselves at all costs.

14 posted on 01/23/2010 8:01:15 AM PST by SteamShovel (When hope trumps reality, there is no hope at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
These rotten commie liars need to be given a last smoke and a bullet.

Skip the last smoke. Go straight to the bullet. Smoking is bad for your health.

15 posted on 01/23/2010 8:04:02 AM PST by Rocky (Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

It is evident that scientists are unwilling or unable to police their own. Which is a damn shame.


19 posted on 01/23/2010 9:05:57 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

IPCC continues to show it’s contempt for Science. Soot has been recognized as the primary (or at least equal) contributor to the melting of Himalayan glaciers for some time now.

New Study Turns Up the Heat on Soot’s Role in Himalayan Warming

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091214173646.htm


20 posted on 01/23/2010 9:19:53 AM PST by PeteCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; Ernest_at_the_Beach; steelyourfaith; SunkenCiv
"These rotten commie liars need to be given a last smoke and a bullet."
Rope and a stout tree branch can also work rather well. Let us not forget. There are major world corporations that do not believe in the concept of communism, quite the contrary, that are behind the scenes. They are the ones that will lose literally hundreds of billions of dollars as the AGW issue subsides. We place to much emphasis on the Baghdad Dad guy of global warming. We must stay focused on the over all plan to create whole new industries based on lies. We pay for it out of our pocket books and wallets.
21 posted on 01/23/2010 6:27:07 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson