To: norwaypinesavage; neverdem; Anima Mundi; ebiskit; TenthAmendmentChampion; Obadiah; ...
Good catch. This presents a very good set of objective arguments to deal with warming zealots. Agreed; I think it's excellent. Bookmarking.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
15 posted on
03/17/2010 6:51:21 AM PDT by
E.G.C.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion; neverdem; All
I propose this checklist as a rough-and-ready list of signs for when to consider doubting a scientific consensus, whatever the subject.(13) When the frontman for the consensus of scientists is a POS politician named Al "No Controlling Legal Authority", "HE PLAYED ON OUR FEARS" Gore. (Sometimes ad hominen attacks are necessary and true, otherwise...who will protect us from our protectors?)
Thanks for the ping, c_I_c; post, neverdem. OUTSTANDING article by Jay Richards.
17 posted on
03/17/2010 9:32:43 AM PDT by
PGalt
To: conservatism_IS_compassion; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks for the ping. Now if we could just get the Coming Ice Age/AGW/The Sky is Falling cheerleaders in the Ministry of Information to apply it. Doubtful it would even make a chink in the armor though.
18 posted on
03/17/2010 4:50:57 PM PDT by
ForGod'sSake
(You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson