Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: norwaypinesavage; neverdem; Anima Mundi; ebiskit; TenthAmendmentChampion; Obadiah; ...
Good catch. This presents a very good set of objective arguments to deal with warming zealots.
Agreed; I think it's excellent. Bookmarking.

14 posted on 03/17/2010 6:26:43 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ( DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

BTTT


15 posted on 03/17/2010 6:51:21 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion; neverdem; All
I propose this checklist as a rough-and-ready list of signs for when to consider doubting a scientific “consensus,” whatever the subject.

(13) When the frontman for the consensus of scientists is a POS politician named Al "No Controlling Legal Authority", "HE PLAYED ON OUR FEARS" Gore. (Sometimes ad hominen attacks are necessary and true, otherwise...who will protect us from our protectors?)

Thanks for the ping, c_I_c; post, neverdem. OUTSTANDING article by Jay Richards.

17 posted on 03/17/2010 9:32:43 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks for the ping. Now if we could just get the Coming Ice Age/AGW/The Sky is Falling cheerleaders in the Ministry of Information to apply it. Doubtful it would even make a chink in the armor though.


18 posted on 03/17/2010 4:50:57 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson