Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists decry "assaults" on climate research (~250 U.S. National Academy of Sciences members)
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 5/8/10 | Deborah Zabarenko

Posted on 05/08/2010 3:37:16 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – More than 250 U.S. scientists on Thursday defended climate change research against "political assaults" and warned that any delay in tackling global warming heightens the risk of a planet-wide catastrophe.

The scientists, all members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, targeted critics who have urged postponing any action against climate change because of alleged problems with research shown in a series of hacked e-mails that are collectively known as "climate-gate."

"When someone says that society should wait until scientists are absolutely certain before taking any action, it is the same as saying society should never take action," the 255 scientists wrote in an open letter in the journal Science.

"For a problem as potentially catastrophic as climate change, taking no action poses a dangerous risk for our planet," they wrote. They said they were deeply disturbed by "recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and on climate scientists in particular."

Scientists sounded a similar note on Thursday before the U.S. House of Representatives panel on energy independence and climate change.

"The reality of anthropogenic climate change can no longer be debated on scientific grounds," James Hurrell of the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research told the committee. "The imperative is to act aggressively to reduce carbon emissions and dependency on fossil fuels."

U.S. legislation aimed at cutting climate-warming pollution could be unveiled in the Senate next week.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: assaults; climate; climatechange; decry; globalwarming; goonch; jpb; nationalacademy; scientists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: NormsRevenge

Looks like they’ve reached the foot stamping stange.


21 posted on 05/08/2010 4:33:01 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Maybe they should stop spewing hot air, then.


22 posted on 05/08/2010 4:34:49 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 ( Two-state solution: A bad idea whose time has gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Global Climate Change. Global Climate Hope. Yes, we global can.


23 posted on 05/08/2010 4:35:59 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 ( Two-state solution: A bad idea whose time has gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

There is no “assault” on climate research. The so-called climate “scientists” had no ethics or morals and corrupted science and scientific method. THEY perverted data for their political ends. They are losers and should be put in jail, beaten with their lousy dissertations and made to wear dunce hats. “Assault” my ass.


24 posted on 05/08/2010 4:38:35 PM PDT by hal ogen ($10 (I think) ajmo0unts through the internet from all over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is what a real scientific report looks like. Testimony of The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley Before Congress May 6, 2010
http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/testimony_of_the_viscount_monckton_of_brenchley_before_congress_may_6_2010/


25 posted on 05/08/2010 4:38:38 PM PDT by 20 years too late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
"As I understand it, global warming of the type pushed by warmists means significantly higher temperatures in the Arctic and very similar temperatures in the tropics."

Water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas and it essentially negates increases in CO2 absorption. Whatever temperature that any particular layer, or region has now will simply be increased by hte same factor. There's no reason for energy to accumulate anywhere in the system. That would violate the principle of equipartition of energy.

" The severity of the storms is driven primarily by the difference in temperature of these areas, not by the absolute temperature."

The energy of each region is multiplied by essentially the same factor.

"So global warming should in theory result in less severe storms."

The neergy factor is <~0.7%. The bottom line is that the increase is insignificant and that does not justify turning over control of anything to any self appointed group of priviledged experts.

26 posted on 05/08/2010 4:53:56 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

believe it or not the temp will be dropping here in Burlington VT and we are supposed to have snow tomorrow, i don’t know how much but we had some 2 wks ago back in April


27 posted on 05/08/2010 5:28:56 PM PDT by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Free Nobel Peace Prize with oil change =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I am surprised that they only managed to get 250 of the 2100 NAS members to sign on to this. I wonder why the remaining members didn’t weigh in.


28 posted on 05/08/2010 5:47:50 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

These “scientists” have nothing to do with climate science. Most are biologists or ecologists, in other words, tree-hugging earth muffins. Global warming is a religion to them, not a scientific pursuit. Oh, by the way, they are all cashing in on global warming grants for their studies of dung beetles by claiming that their research will demonstrate the evils of America and capitalism.


29 posted on 05/08/2010 5:54:19 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

I don’t think the signitores are NAS members. Their assn’s are with Universities.


30 posted on 05/08/2010 6:13:13 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Many of these “scientists” are the same ones who were fearlessly predicting “global cooling” and a new Ice Age back in the ‘70s, but then the grant money and the TV gigs shifted, so now it’s “global warming,” and it’s only a coincidence, I suppose, that the result of “global warming” is greater power for government.


31 posted on 05/08/2010 6:14:25 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

May 8th 2010, we had snow last night. Global warming my behind.


32 posted on 05/08/2010 6:56:04 PM PDT by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Looks like they’ve reached the foot stamping stange.

They've been in the rug chewing stage since the beginning of their warming lies and propaganda. These charlatans who call themselves scientists are the overtly political ones - they are virtually all Leftists and opposed to rational thought and scientific debate.

33 posted on 05/08/2010 7:15:39 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This list should be helpful in the future to identify them as the bought-and-paid-for political whores they are.


34 posted on 05/08/2010 7:17:46 PM PDT by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Sorry, the signatories were NAS members.


35 posted on 05/08/2010 8:02:36 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The Polar Bear photo that accompanied the letter was a photoshop job.

(I don’t know if Science inserted it or the authors did).

But how can they decry us questioning their integrity when their very letter demonstrates a lack of it.


36 posted on 05/09/2010 7:26:24 AM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson