You being unwilling to respond is very convenient for you, but the only potential lie that regards Hayworth is that he knew about Simcox’ past and “accepted” his endorsement.
Let’s face it, there are lots of endorsements accepted from people who aren’t perfect. The correct response isn’t to brand it a lie but to say, “So what? McCain was endorsed by Lindsay Graham.”
If that’s a dealbreaker, there won’t be any endorsements. Besides “accepting an endorsement” is a huge range. Reagan accepted the endorsement of the Log Cabin crowd saying that he was happy that they agreed with him.
If you call somebody a liar, you’d better have countering facts and if you ban someone for making arguments you can’t counter, then you’re admitting that you can’t win the argument.
Let’s cut to the chase. Who are YOU supporting Sparky? McCain, or Hayworth?
” You being unwilling to respond is very convenient for you, but the only potential lie that regards Hayworth is that he knew about Simcox’ past and “accepted” his endorsement. “
Do you have a habit of reading only half of a sentence??
” Chris Simcox who is now supporting JD Hayworth and who has been advising him.”
Soooooo.....Simcox is ADVISING J.D. Hayworth????
” JD Hayworth accepted Simcox’s endorsement whith his background being common knowledge. “
Bare-faced lie.
” JD Hayworth was late entering the primary because he had to pay back the money to convicted felon Jack Abramoff. “
Bare-faced lie.
” Rep.J.D. Hayworth the largest single recipient of Abramoff related money and co-chairman of the Congressional Native American Caucus, has received more than $150,000 from Indian tribes once represented by Abramoff. “
Bare-faced lie.
” If you call somebody a liar, you’d better have countering facts and if you ban someone for making arguments you can’t counter, then you’re admitting that you can’t win the argument.”
Fair enough. Now show me proof of any of these slanderous lies I posted above, or get lost!!