Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia balks at engine shipment to China(Sukhoi stops shipment)
UPI ^ | 7/8/2010 | UPI

Posted on 07/08/2010 5:43:16 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The head of Russia's MiG and Sukhoi aircraft design bureaus has stopped further export of RD-93 engines to China, citing use of the engines in MiG-29 clones.

Pravda, in a report earlier this week, said Mikhial Pogosyan sent an official letter to Russia's defense export enterprise Rosoboronexport, saying he made the decision because China's FC-1 jet fighter, which has been using the RD-93 engines, is a competitor to the MiG-29.

"Russian engineers are facing a tough choice: either to refuse from the contract (with China) worth $3.75 billion or lose African and Asian markets," Pravda wrote. "China's FC-1 does not have the advantage over Russia's MiG-29 from the point of view of performance but it is much cheaper: $10 million versus $35 million.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china; fc1; mig; mig29; rd93; russia; sukhoi

1 posted on 07/08/2010 5:43:18 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


2 posted on 07/08/2010 5:45:28 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Oh boy — I’m sure the ChiComs are THRILLED with THAT development


3 posted on 07/08/2010 5:46:34 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

So China can build a fighter for 10 million?


4 posted on 07/08/2010 5:55:29 PM PDT by omega4179 (www.jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

Ha! In America we can NOT build a fighter for $10 million.
{Instead we’ll spend that $10 Million on a lawsuit against Arizona...}
[/cynic]


5 posted on 07/08/2010 6:00:19 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

An F-105 Thunderchief cost 2.14 million in 1960 when we still knew how to procure and produce weapons. Inflation adjusted, it would cost 15.7 million. This Chinese plane is a winner just on price if it is as cheap to maintain as a Mig-29


6 posted on 07/08/2010 6:06:31 PM PDT by omega4179 (www.jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

Yeah... that was back when we COULD produce.

But maybe the Chinese version is like some of the “cheap Chinese” stuff where a break-and-replace policy is more cost effective than “maintenance.”


7 posted on 07/08/2010 6:12:12 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

For a very long time now, a military aircraft is not a mode of trasportation, it is a weapons platform.

If all you want is a fuselage, wings, and an engine, you can build an aircraft for $10 million.

However, if you want a fully integrated avionics package including a decent radar, navigation, smart bombs, targeting pods, electronic countermeasures, failure redundancy, computer controlled flight controls, electronic full authority digital engine control, etc., it will cost $50-60 million.

The cost of an aircraft is not just how much the steel, titanium, aluminum, and paint cost, but also how much it cost to design and develop the airframe. When you rip off someone else’s design, you bypass a large hunk of that cost.


8 posted on 07/08/2010 6:15:04 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

You also need to take into account the deep corruption within the Russian Army and Russian Military Industrial Complex.


9 posted on 07/08/2010 6:26:26 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I think that Russia might finally be seeing the light, or at least a glimmer of the light. Too bad they haven’t put 2 and 2 together on Iran yet.


10 posted on 07/08/2010 6:28:54 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Hopefully they will tackle the corruption in their aerospace industry.


11 posted on 07/08/2010 6:31:54 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

plan B The WS-13 for Guizhou Aero Engine Group.
plan C The WS-9 or WS-9A for Xian Aero Engine Group.


12 posted on 07/08/2010 7:16:56 PM PDT by Kevin J waldroup ( Go Duncan Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

chicom bump for later........


13 posted on 07/08/2010 8:22:02 PM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
they build thermonuclear devices but can't make a dependable jet engine...
14 posted on 07/08/2010 8:23:54 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
and the wily chins couldn't see that coming???

my bookie coulda told me that...

15 posted on 07/08/2010 8:39:21 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson