To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Swift's measurements showed that the burst emitted 143,000 X-ray photons per second during its short period of greatest brightness. That's more than 140 times brighter than the brightest continuous X-ray source in the sky a neutron star that releases a steady 10,000 X-ray photons per second. How does this math work? And does this mean emitted in all directions all told or per so much angular area or at the telescope or what?
3 posted on
07/14/2010 4:59:19 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
How does this math work?The author needs a refresher course in multiplication...
9 posted on
07/14/2010 5:15:38 PM PDT by
Zeppo
("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
To: HiTech RedNeck
The burst is directional and narrow as it propagates from the polar regions of the nova or supernova. If concentrated enough, a gamma ray burst would devastate life on earth.
To: HiTech RedNeck
143 000 photons per second could only be the flux intercepted by the sensor.
I’m just guessing—making a SWAG—that the total flux at the source would be about a quadrillion quadrillion times that.
27 posted on
07/14/2010 5:57:43 PM PDT by
Erasmus
(Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
How does this math work? And does this mean emitted in all directions all told or per so much angular area or at the telescope or what? Nowadays, science reporters are like science teachers. There's no requirement that they know or understand anything remotely scientific. Instead, they serve as "communicators", just as the teachers are "facilitators".
36 posted on
07/14/2010 9:03:06 PM PDT by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson