Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/28/2010 7:00:49 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Hojczyk

Gosh I love Joe! I just wish he wouldn’t show up on Fox News anymore for debates. He’s a much better enforcer than he is a debater.


2 posted on 07/28/2010 7:02:09 PM PDT by Engineer_Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

...we only need 2000 more Joe Arpaio’s


4 posted on 07/28/2010 7:03:33 PM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Exactly right. AZ needs to do the right thing and just ignore he federal government.


5 posted on 07/28/2010 7:05:32 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Joe is a gem. Put round peg in round hole, put square peg in square hole, NOW turn the crank!

Histry shows that Fascists can't deal with guys like Joe, they simply kill them, which is why I worry about Joe.

6 posted on 07/28/2010 7:05:53 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is fascist... ..He meets every diagnostic of history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Make them wear pink underwear Joe!


7 posted on 07/28/2010 7:06:58 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; Borax Queen; Hildy; Arizona Carolyn; McGavin999
“You know what? They’re not going to block our jails. They’re going into the jail if they block our jail. I’m not going to succumb to these demonstrators keeping law enforcement from booking people in our jail. So we may have to take some action.”


9 posted on 07/28/2010 7:08:25 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Sheriff Joe is my pick for Attorney General.


11 posted on 07/28/2010 7:10:05 PM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

This is a great time to get arrested. Living in a tent during the monsoons. LOL!


12 posted on 07/28/2010 7:12:58 PM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

ooh rah


18 posted on 07/28/2010 7:19:26 PM PDT by dhuynh73 (Reagan Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

The Judge never ruled he couldn’t enforce the law. If his officers encounter impediment of law enforcement they will act accordingly. He knows where he stands.


24 posted on 07/28/2010 7:26:51 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

If Arizona is barred from enforcing federal immigration laws, what OTHER federal laws need to be ignored?

Let’s start with speed limits and go from there!


26 posted on 07/28/2010 7:28:36 PM PDT by DNME (Prepare ... quickly. Time grows short.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

wine=Arpaio? i figured him to be a non-drinker who knew?


32 posted on 07/28/2010 7:34:10 PM PDT by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Free Nobel Peace Prize with oil change =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

God Bless Sheriff Joe Arpaio.


36 posted on 07/28/2010 8:06:43 PM PDT by EnglishOnly (Fight all out to win OR get out now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Wonder if he would like to run for President?
37 posted on 07/28/2010 8:15:37 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (Leyte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

It is pretty sickening how they label Sheriff Joe as “controversial”. He is awesome!!!! He is such a hard working patriot!!!! God love that guy and keep him safe!!!!from the evil, left-wing commies who are trying to destroy this great nation!!!!!

And that Clinton appointed judge who takes her orders from Satan. She knows where she is headed. Shame on that judge for siding with evil.


39 posted on 07/28/2010 8:23:27 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

We should march on Washington DC and remove that racist, evil AG Holder and demand he be replaced by the wonderful, rule-of-law, equal-under-the-law, Sheriff Joe.

How refreshing an honest man is!!!!!!!!I almost forgot what honesty looks like.

Get the racist, fascists out of Washington DC.


40 posted on 07/28/2010 8:31:23 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
I heard a funny, and misleading, statistic cited in today's ABC radio reporting about the situation in Arizona. The reporter said that twice as many whites as non-whites in Arizona supported the law. So I looked for the racial breakdown of Arizona. There are about 4,700,000 whites and about 1,120,000 Hispanic/Latinos. Now I already know that a majority of Hispanic/Latinos describe themselves as white. Everyone else, Asian, black, etc. constitutes a little less than half a million. Since there are three times as many whites as everyone else combined, including Latinos, the fact that there is a 2:1 support of the law white versus non-white means a couple of things: 1. there is a substantial percentage of the non-white population that supports the law or 2. if one half of the non-white population, including Latinos, (800,000) supports the law and twice as many whites support the law than non-white, then only 1,600,000 whites or about 1/3 of the white population supports the law.

The guy's statistic sounds like its saying that whites are a lot more supportive of the law than non-whites (or twice as racist); however, for there to be twice as many white supporters of the law as non-whites, the percentage of the white population that doesn't support it must be greater than the percentage of the non-white population that does not. If 100% of the non-white population (including Hispanic/Latinos) supported the law (~1,600,000), then 3,200,000 or 68% of the white population would support the law. Furthermore, at any point, a 2:1 support, white versus non-white, means that a relatively smaller proportion of the white population supports the law than the non-white population. This means that as a percentage of the racial group, there is a greater percentage of the non-white population that supports the law than the white population.
41 posted on 07/28/2010 8:40:57 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; All
★ FREEDOM!★

★ Estimated Value – PRICELESS! ★

42 posted on 07/28/2010 8:42:58 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER OathKeeper III We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
...he will jail any protesters who attempt to block his jail on Thursday

The RATS can save time and money (not to mention the fragile planet) by showing up in their own pink panties - no?

43 posted on 07/28/2010 8:56:33 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
A American Appears,God Bless and Protect Sheriff Joe.
45 posted on 07/28/2010 9:09:42 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson