Posted on 08/14/2010 4:08:46 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
Officer's defense team demanding Obama docs 'I can't think of a single reason why the judge would take the government's position'
August 13, 2010
By Bob Unruh © 2010 WorldNetDaily
The key defense attorney for an Army officer being put on trial for refusing orders he views as suspect because of the possibility Barack Obama is not eligible to be commander-in-chief is demanding documentation from the president.
On the G. Gordon Liddy radio show today, Paul Rolf Jensen said the request for "discovery" in the Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin case the access by the defense to documentation in the government's possession that could help its case is being submitted.
Jensen had been asked whether there is a legal basis for denying a defendant on trial on criminal charges legitimate access to documentation that would prove his case.
"We are today officially requesting that discovery," Jensen said. "If the government refuses to give it to us, then we will, a week from today, file a motion to compel discovery.
"I can't think of a single reason why the judge would take the government's position," he said.
The controversy stems from the Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Complicating the issue is the fact that besides Obama's actual birth documentation, he has concealed documentation including his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, baptism records and his adoption records.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
They need evidence that he didn’t refuse to deploy, because that’s the only evidence relevant to his case.
Muslime plant in the WH?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jhx_2TqffE&feature=bulletin&videos=1TrwZ7NhG2k
Because he's just another statist who is screerd. They know damn well Obama is a liar.
About half of them are. The other half are warriors. Remember all those generals Bush fired? He put warriors in their place and delegated authority to those in the field. There weren't ass-kissing or affirmative action promotions under Bush. He wanted real facts.
He is a Third World President. So the military must take over and immediately announce new national elections. On April 15th. Primaries in the 50 States can begin immediately as they choose their day. Then the military leaves April 16th.
If the office of the President is not at the top of our chain of command, why did they have us memorize the entire chain while I was in basic training...all military orders run down the chain of command...also it is emphasized that an “unlawful order not only should not, but MUST not be followed”
It is at the top - nobody said otherwise. What was said was not about who is or is not the supreme military commander of US forces.
What was connoted is that the disobeyed order in question may not have come from Zero but instead Lakin's CO.
“If the office of the President is not at the top of our chain of command, why did they have us memorize the entire chain while I was in basic training...all military orders run down the chain of command...also it is emphasized that an unlawful order not only should not, but MUST not be followed”
Thank you for reminding me. When I went throught Navy Basic training in August 1972 I had to know the chain of command all the way from the Chief over me to President Nixon...with the CNO ADM Aumwalt, SECNAV, and SECDEF in there.
Interesting. I’ll be watching!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.