[agere_contra]

44.8 % No

[Road Warrior ‘04]

Makes a lot of sense! All that pollution spewing from hydroelectric plants! /s

Quoting John McEnroe to the enviro-wackos: You can't be serious!

[Road Warrior ‘04]

Makes a lot of sense! All that pollution spewing from hydroelectric plants! /s

Quoting John McEnroe to the enviro-wackos: You can't be serious!

[SandRat]

Should The Klamath Dams Be Removed?
Yes
49.7%
No
46.9%
Undecided
3.4%

First Vote : Wednesday, 25 August 2010 10:13
Last Vote : Wednesday, 01 September 2010 07:49

[huldah1776]

Sorry, I heard that in Arkansas the Army Corp of Engineers built a dam that the local people DID NOT want using eminent domain. If solar power will replace a dam, I say go for it. I know there is more to every story though, so I have to dig a little more.

[poobear]

Tied at 48.8 No, 48 Yes.

[Kaosinla]

No 51%
Yes 46.1%
Undecided 2.9%

First Vote : Wednesday, 25 August 2010 10:13
Last Vote : Wednesday, 01 September 2010 07:55

[bassmaner]

So, envirowacko geniuses: what happens when the sun doesn't shine? How will you be able to watch MSNBC and catch the latest Matolberdow rant about Sarah Palin being the Antichrist?

A stationary bike powered generator? Inquiring minds want to know ...

[DoughtyOne]

No, 53.3%.

Thanks for alerting us to the internet poll.

Take that lefties...

[george76]

Over 57 percent ...NO

[RhoTheta]

These dams were all built decades ago and are fully capitalized. They are reliable sources of power using renewable green energy. The environmental hit was taken when the dams were first built and the lakes formed. The environment adjusted, and we have nearly free power from proven technology.

Now, the environmentalists want to radically alter the ecology by draining the lakes, ruining local economies and the established balance, and replace the lost power sources with unproven solar (funded by taxpayers). Power companies that own these hydro plants and depend upon them for a reliable source of green energy will then have to purchase the solar power from subsidized "green" companies when it is even available.

Figure major energy price increases!

[Godzilla]

bump

[Ratman83]

Should The Klamath Dams Be Removed?
No
59.8%
Yes
37.8%
Undecided
2.4%

First Vote : Wednesday, 25 August 2010 10:13
Last Vote : Wednesday, 01 September 2010 08:38

[AngelesCrestHighway]

L.O.L.!.....No’s are way ahead now! Ha! Ha!

[muleskinner]

If these dams go, there better be a big pile of salmon coming back in return, but that won’t be for several years. I suspect the Kurok tribe east of Eureka, and local salmon fishermen are backing this too.

[whinecountry]

FReeped. Calif. gets more insane daily.

[jimt]

Your freep is working, nearly 60% “NO” now.

[Hotmetal]

60.3% NO
37.7% YES
2% Undecided

Seems to be working.

[ApplegateRanch]

Should The Klamath Dams Be Removed?
No
59.7%
Yes
38.3%
Undecided
2%

First Vote : Wednesday, 25 August 2010 10:13
Last Vote : Wednesday, 01 September 2010 10:30

---

Couldn’t vote on the above because the poll now is about banning dredging in Oregon. At least it is going the Right way, too.

[dynachrome]

Enviro-stalinists at work. Thanks to George76 for the ping!

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)