To: Palter
This guy totally misses the point. “Should gays marry?” He is correct that the Constitution doesn’t address gay marriage, and that is why it falls back to the State authorities.
To: RightInEastLansing
He is correct that the Constitution doesn’t address gay marriage, and that is why it falls back to the State authorities. Oh, I guess you missed it. The 9th and 10th Amendments were repealed, I believe during either the Roosevelt or Johnson administrations. My memory is a little foggy on just when. /s
17 posted on
09/25/2010 1:20:39 PM PDT by
mc5cents
To: RightInEastLansing
He is correct that the Constitution doesn’t address gay marriage, and that is why it falls back to the State authorities. Bzzzt. The 14th amendment ruined all that.
48 posted on
09/25/2010 3:06:51 PM PDT by
Huck
(Q: How can you tell a party is in the minority? A: They're complaining about the deficit.)
To: RightInEastLansing
"This guy totally misses the point. “Should gays marry?” He is correct that the Constitution doesn’t address gay marriage, and that is why it falls back to the State authorities."One thing is certain that some judges seem unable to get. It absolutely does not compel gay marriage.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson