1 posted on
10/02/2010 12:18:25 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
All a person needs to know about “climate change” is that it’s the same thing we used to call “the weather” back during the time when the majority of the people living on the planet were sane and there weren’t so many greedy con men out there running scams to steal other people’s money.
2 posted on
10/02/2010 12:25:24 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Help stamp out political correctness.)
To: neverdem
Hey, to those concerned about AGW: cook up a plan to replace coal plants with nukes and I'll sign on.
Oh, and stop ripping down hydro plants and devising schemes to further snarl traffic by tolling roads.
Oh, and end all legal and tax-based obstacles to telecommuting.
But you really aren't going to do those things now, are you?
3 posted on
10/02/2010 12:27:18 PM PDT by
Tribune7
(The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
To: neverdem
A 19-page guide prepared by leading international scientists, including society fellows, is an honest account of where climate change science is clear and where it is less certain, such as the impact of energy emitted by the sun. What would the temperature of earth be without the sun?
Simple question. Inconvenient answer.
4 posted on
10/02/2010 12:30:58 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: neverdem
This is so depressing:
“...pursuing the cautionary, responsible approach long advocated by The Weekend Australian. The society cites strong evidence that increases in greenhouse gases due to human activity are the dominant cause of global warming.”
HE’S DEAD, JIM!
7 posted on
10/02/2010 1:15:52 PM PDT by
Bhoy
To: neverdem
...an honest account of where climate change science is clear and where it is less certain, such as the impact of energy emitted by the sun. LOL - "honest account." Not counting value weighting, of course - just listing everything as equal, including the sun's impact on climate.
A similiar "honesty" would be like saying: "We are extremely clear about the exact color of the paint on this nuclear warhead. We are not so clear about the power of the warhead itself, however, which continues to be debated by experts contending everything from a firecracker all the way up to the hundred-kiloton range. But let us be clear - we are making an honest account here of both the paint color and the fact that we fully admit that the nuclear bomb does, indeed, have some level of danger to it."
8 posted on
10/02/2010 1:34:44 PM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
To: neverdem
A 19-page guide [...] is an honest account of Beware any (ANY) document that starts out with "this is an honest account".
9 posted on
10/02/2010 1:41:14 PM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: neverdem
More nonsense from the left trying to rescue their pet theory.
14 posted on
10/02/2010 4:04:14 PM PDT by
devere
To: neverdem; carolinablonde; SolitaryMan; rdl6989; livius; DollyCali; IrishCatholic; meyer; ...
15 posted on
10/02/2010 4:09:09 PM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis.)
To: neverdem
The 43 society members now believe the society's previous position was too strident and implied a greater degree of certainty than was justified. Implied? Try CLAIMED! This is a whitewash.
16 posted on
10/02/2010 5:19:45 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
To: neverdem
The Royal Society sets out a strong case for pursuing the cautionary, responsible approach long advocated by The Weekend Australian. The society cites strong evidence that increases in greenhouse gases due to human activity are the dominant cause of global warming.Seems like the same old stuff repackaged with a new label.
17 posted on
10/02/2010 5:21:32 PM PDT by
CedarDave
(Ten-year anniversary - proudly Freeping since Aug 17, 2000)
To: neverdem; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
18 posted on
10/02/2010 5:47:54 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Muslims are not the problem, the rest of the world is! /s)
To: neverdem
It's still a Hoax and a Scam....to further Global Governance...started by the UN.
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
the Royal Society, has acknowledged the limits of current scientific understanding of climate change, revising its outlook
NOT ENOUGH -- the Royal Society needs to condemn the whole blasted pile of BS as having originated in politics and having been sustained by politics. Until they do that, they are not to be trusted. Thanks neverdem.
26 posted on
10/03/2010 7:50:41 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
To: neverdem
‘The 43 society members now believe the society’s previous position was too strident and implied a greater degree of certainty than was justified.’
NOW they tell us.
27 posted on
10/03/2010 7:54:35 PM PDT by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
('“Our own government has become our enemy' - Sheriff Paul Babeu)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
