Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

“Don’t confuse climate science-ish with actual science.”

Since The National Academy of Sciences, The Royal Society, The American Association for the Advancement of Science, Nature, and Scientific American, have all expressed themselves forcefully and dogmatically in favor of bogus climate science, the reputation of science as a whole is now in disrepute.

My condolences to real scientists who still do real scientific work.


13 posted on 10/17/2010 9:15:07 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: devere
It really is a shame, as I said, that Nature and others who should know better (or know enough to stay out of areas that are not their own) have decided that the hill peer reviewed reproducible science should fight and die on is this bogus anthropogenic climate change garbage where they have to use a ‘trick’ to ‘hide the decline’ and ‘redefine the peer review process if we have to’.

If anyone in actual science were caught doing ANY of that it would be termination time, and rightly so.

I am unsure of the argument why this is A-OK in climate science-ish when it would be grounds for termination and intellectual exile in science.

14 posted on 10/17/2010 9:25:30 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson