[wagglebee]

In an appearance on the Bill Press radio show, PP president Cecile Richards said that, although the costs of the federal health care bill already promise to skyrocket out of control, federal officials ought to consider covering birth control a priority because of the "cost savings" benefit of fewer children being born.

How long before she openly advocates just killing the "worthless eaters"?

[wagglebee]

Pro-Life Ping

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[trisham]

This is incredibly disturbing.

[muawiyah]

Cecile Richards tells us that fewer people is a better condition for the rest of us.

I strongly encourage her to show us the way by jumping from a tall building or something.

We can judge if our lives have improved through her death (and I'd almost bet they will ~ in this one special case).

[CommieCutter]

FEWER PEOPLE IN THE GOV'T MEANS LESS GOV'T COST!!!

[tiki]

OMG!

[jacob allen]

I’m sure she wants to deport all the Illegals????

[Alas Babylon!]

I would argue the opposite. More people in a 1st world, modern environment means more productivity, more consumers of goods, more wage earners, more tax revenues and a benefit to us all. With new technologies we pollute less, can have a smaller environmental footprint and “be fruitful and multiply” as the Good Lord instructed us.

For years the God/People hating elitists have said we have to have less people (always US, never THEM) and man is a scourge on the planet.

God made the Earth for us and us for the Earth. He gave us a very intelligent mind to be creative and not wasteful. If only our souls were as good!

[A message]

Human extinction would also lower government costs.

These population control freaks are insane.

[BigBobber]

Ms. Richards is espousing the ANTI-HUMAN world view shared by most liberals. People, human beings, are an ugly, defective race who always take more than they give, create nothing of beauty or value, and need to be eliminated.

This is the mindset that justifies the murders of tens of millions, hundreds of millions, in the name of the common good and the making of a better mankind.

Keep it in mind whenever you hear them speak, tell yourselves over and over, ANTI-HUMAN, ANTI-HUMAN, ANTI-HUMAN...

[rbosque]

But that means less wealth created and less tax revenue.

But if she insists on less people, she can start with herself.

[free from tyranny]

It’s obvious from looking at her. She is one of them, an alien. Not the kind from Mexico, either. Her fellow kind have infested the gov’t just like the stink bugs in the eastern US. I’ll bet under that perfectly symmetrical exterior she is filled with bug like creatures. Time to call the Men in Black.
And not Obama, since he is only half black.

[Mr. Silverback]

Given where and how PP operates, Richards really meant that fewer black people mean less government cost. Racist scumbags.

[OldPossum]

I have no problem with contraception. Sometimes it takes total sense. I personally went the route of making sure that my wife and I would have no children, not even a possibility of any. Shortly before getting married I had a vasectomy. And some 39 years later, there have been none.

It worked.

[Waryone]

If they eliminated welfare, a lot fewer children would be born into poverty. They could eliminate scores of govt welfare workers. If they also eliminated planned parenthood funding, perhaps people would be encouraged to learn to live more responsibly.

[redgolum]

As the economy worsens, the call for the killing of the feeble and costly, young and old, will become louder and louder.

Lord have mercy.

[little jeremiah]

Next stop on this train to hell is Soylent Green.

[reg45]

Only if you assume that all additional people will be non-productive. Otherwise, additional productive people will pay more taxes.

[rockinqsranch]

To “H” with PP less, or elimination of Liberals/Leftists in government will reduce costs of government extraordinarily.

[Maceman]

The president of Planned Parenthood has argued that the new federal health care reform ought to consider funding all contraception with taxpayer dollars because preventing new children leads to less government expense.

She has it exactly backwards. The people are not a cost to the government; the government is a cost to the people.

And we need to drastically cut that cost, before it drowns us in a tsunami of debt and oppression (and I pray that is still possible).