from the "just when you think you've heard it all" file
1 posted on
11/19/2010 1:01:19 PM PST by
kingattax
To: kingattax
2 posted on
11/19/2010 1:02:58 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
To: kingattax
When it’s all said and done, the vote in Heaven will be the vote these people will have to face.
3 posted on
11/19/2010 1:03:51 PM PST by
Jim W N
To: kingattax
Wow. Just wow.
Life is so cheap nowadays as to be put to the whims of an Internet mob fir fun.
Even if it’s not real (doing it for attention), it says a lot about the state of society.
To: kingattax
As noted in the 10 or 15 prior posts - the site is a pro-life HOAX.
5 posted on
11/19/2010 1:06:33 PM PST by
ASOC
(What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
To: kingattax
With this much love and desire to have the baby, they should put the child up for adoption.
6 posted on
11/19/2010 1:06:46 PM PST by
HarleyD
To: kingattax
might as well be in the Colliseum with the proverbial thumbs up or thumbs down vote based on crowd reaction.
7 posted on
11/19/2010 1:06:54 PM PST by
sappy
(criminalibs)
To: kingattax
I have no use for this type that thinks the planned murder of the most helpless is okay!
9 posted on
11/19/2010 1:08:44 PM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
To: kingattax
I say have the baby and give it up for adoption. These twits obviously are not fit to be parents.
11 posted on
11/19/2010 1:10:46 PM PST by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: kingattax
Seems to me their parents should have aborted them!
To: kingattax
Their doing this to get attention. They’re stupid at best and evil at worst. oh dear look lets ask people on the internet if we should execute our child or not? They will probably make horrible parents.
15 posted on
11/19/2010 1:14:32 PM PST by
MsLady
(If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
To: kingattax
This is making me nauseous.
Site says almost 81% for Birth.
109,000 votes casted. Hopefully they'll listen.
16 posted on
11/19/2010 1:18:16 PM PST by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: kingattax
I browse DU on occasion. Saw this on there yesterday. Even the DUmmies were unanimously appalled (though a few of them thought this was a pro-life stunt to make pro-abortioners look bad).
SnakeDoc
17 posted on
11/19/2010 1:19:17 PM PST by
SnakeDoctor
(Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum -- If you wish for peace, prepare for war.)
To: kingattax
So how long will it be before someone figures out a
'bidding' scheme where the highest bidder get's to make the
woman's choice for a nominal fee?
If someone truly believes a baby is no more than a tissue mass, why not hold it hostage over someone who might feel compelled to save a life? (emotional extortion)
18 posted on
11/19/2010 1:23:38 PM PST by
ResearchMonkey
(Holding Conservative Country in California.)
To: kingattax
What a couple of sick, sick minded people. Lord help us.
20 posted on
11/19/2010 1:30:27 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Obama sez I'm an enemy and I will be punished. My Savior has overcome the world.)
To: kingattax
22 posted on
11/19/2010 1:35:07 PM PST by
It's me
To: kingattax
How about we all vote to just have Alisha’s tubes tied?
23 posted on
11/19/2010 1:42:17 PM PST by
peteram
To: kingattax
24 posted on
11/19/2010 1:43:26 PM PST by
diamond6
(Pray the Rosary to defeat communism and Obamacare!!)
To: kingattax
A couple of things to note on this story:
It's been reported that theyve already lost two pregnancies recently to miscarriage and the mother lost another when she was 20. A normal couple in that position (especially one with no children) would be desperate to see this one carried to term, not cavalier to the point of treating it as some sort of morbid civics experiment.
Pierre "Pete" Arnold, has worked for a right-wing radio talk show and blogged for an anti-choice right-wing Web site.
Putting the URL into Whois to find out the domain registration information revelas two things. One is that they've paid the extra fee to hide who actually registered the site. Two, they registered the site on May 17, 2010. Their story is that she got pregnant and they wanted to put it up to a vote, so they started this site. If that was true, then the very earliest she could be in her pregnancy is 27 weeks, presuming they started the site as soon as they learned. By the time she claims she'll be at 20 weeks--on Dec. 9--she would actually be at 29, and likely higher.
28 posted on
11/19/2010 2:27:31 PM PST by
NC28203
To: kingattax
30 posted on
11/19/2010 3:19:18 PM PST by
NoGrayZone
(This is not an election on November 2. This is a restraining order. - PJ O'Rourke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson