I don’t know. It was meant to address your question of how much he could capture in a frame not a specific point in time.Well, it's kind of a moot point if we don't know where he was pointing and how zoomed in he was at that point in time, isn't it.
”The separate smaller trail that is separate from the main body of the plume and that was captured by Warren in his photos, which makes it seem as if the object continued in flight, appears in my video to possibly be the top portion of the plume that partly dissipates leaving a segment of the tip adrift - detached from the main body of the plume. (I highlight "possibly be" because during that portion of the video, I zoom in and out and pan off and back onto the plume, so I'm not sure if what we are seeing is a stage of separation like that of a missile or if it's the tip of the plume separating from the main portion)."He says he zoomed in and out at that portion of the video. The pic in #111 shows how far out he could zoom. He also speaks of how long he "viewed the object."
He videotaped the contrail for a total of ten minutes and subsequently continued to view the contrail for an additional ten minutes. Leyvas maintains that the object itself that created the contrail only remained in view for two to three minutes. For 30 to 45 seconds, the object glowed brightly and then seemed to disappear from view.