Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

When Twain wrote HF the word did not have the “ultimate insult” connotation it does today. It was at most mildly denigrating rather than something used to more or less justify any reaction up to and including murder. You can’t tell me the meaning and connotations of the word haven’t changed.

If they haven’t, why are you yourself so carefully avoiding typing it?


28 posted on 01/05/2011 9:13:26 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

I agree. In a similar note, I remember when the word ‘sucks’, had really bad connatations. Now, it’s everywhere.


32 posted on 01/05/2011 10:05:22 AM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
"You can’t tell me the meaning and connotations of the word haven’t changed."

I said zip about "connotations". I said "meaning". Which has not changed at all. Yeah, there has been an onus put on it, but that changes not one thing about Twain's book.

The only people who get upset about Twain are the same ones who object to "niggardly". IOW, idiots.

"If they haven’t, why are you yourself so carefully avoiding typing it?"

What make you think I've "carefully avoided it". I've got no problem with typing "nigger". It's a perfectly valid English word.

34 posted on 01/05/2011 12:11:58 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson