To: tapatio
They want the section about blacks being less than fully citizens read. Oh wow. It was removed by amendment.
7 posted on
01/06/2011 8:02:54 AM PST by
Amityschild
(STOP SPENDING FOOLS!)
To: Amityschild
And even that 3/5ths compromise was actually about giving the “slave states” less influence in the government.
14 posted on
01/06/2011 8:04:01 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Amityschild
They don’t even understand why it was really inserted there in the first place.
15 posted on
01/06/2011 8:04:05 AM PST by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Forcing one person to pay for the irresponsibility of another is NOT social justice.)
To: Amityschild
Oh, next they want to read all past cases decided by the USSC, such as the Dred Scott case?
popcorn please
20 posted on
01/06/2011 8:05:30 AM PST by
silverleaf
(All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
To: Amityschild
They want the section about blacks being less than fully citizens read. Oh wow. It was removed by amendment.It was never there in the first place. There is nothing in the original that mentions black people, or that declares them to be 3/5 of a person.
45 posted on
01/06/2011 8:27:14 AM PST by
Maceman
(Obama -- he's as American as nasi goreng)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson