Posted on 02/12/2011 5:26:34 AM PST by Kaslin
A week after Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday celebration, comparisons between presidents Obama and Reagan continue.
The conversation began when Obama praised Reagan in a USA Today op-ed. He commended Reagan’s leadership, his confidence in and optimism for America, and his great ability to communicate his vision for the country. Reaganites like myself appreciate these sentiments.
But so far, the differences between the two presidents are still huge.
Begin with the economy. Reagan and Obama both inherited deep and brutal recessions. But the first six recovery quarters look completely different for each president.
So far, real GDP has averaged only 3 percent annually for Obama. Employment as defined by nonfarm payrolls has increased by a paltry 121,000.
On the other hand, going back to Reagan’s first six recovery quarters, real GDP averaged 7.7 percent annually while nonfarm payrolls rose by 5.3 million.
No two situations are exactly alike. Reagan inherited massive double-digit inflation with 20 percent interest rates. Obama was left with a colossal financial meltdown. But Reagan’s economic vision put private-sector free-enterprise at the center. Obama has chosen a massive expansion of government power.
These are huge differences. One succeeded, while thus far the other has not.
While Obama’s first act was an $800 billion government-spending package, one of Reagan’s first decisions was a near $50 billion domestic-spending cut ($100 billion constant dollars today). Obama went for a nationalized health-care plan, energy cap-and-tax-and-trade, and pro-union card check. Reagan ended wage and price controls, deregulated all energy prices, terminated the Synthetic Fuels Corp., and fired the striking air-traffic controllers. Big differences.
Drawing from the work of Arthur Laffer and Robert Mundell, Reagan saw the economic-growth benefits of limited government, lower tax rates, and a dollar as good as gold. Gold prices plunged as Reagan and Paul Volcker worked to vanquish inflation. Ever-soaring inflation was the cruelest tax hike of all. But in the Reagan years the inflation rate dropped from near 13 percent to as low as 2 percent -- a huge disinflation tax cut. Accompanied by lower marginal tax rates, the Reagan policies sparked a powerful recovery in business and jobs.
Reagan slashed tax rates across-the-board for individuals, investors, and businesses. At the margin, his reforms lowered the top personal rate from 70 percent to 28 percent. And he left a simple two-bracket tax code that cut thousands of pages of IRS rules and regulations.
And while the top individual tax rate was slashed under Reagan, individual income-tax revenues increased from roughly $300 billion to $450 billion. In other words, the Laffer curve worked. With surging economic growth, the incentives from lower tax rates actually raised tax revenues.
Mr. Obama, on the other hand, campaigned to raise tax rates on successful earners and investors. Along with the dozens of taxes legislated into Obamacare, these are all job stoppers.
Only after the 2010 election landslide did Mr. Obama finally agree to extend the 2003 Bush tax rates for a couple of years. But, he continues his pledge to hike those taxes again when the deal expires in 2012.
From his experience as a movie actor facing a 90 percent tax rate, Reagan always encouraged success. Everyone’s success. And he came to believe that if it pays more after tax to work and invest, then people will do so.
Of course, Reagan increased the defense budget to defeat the Soviets. But during the seven fat years of growth -- to use the late Robert Bartley’s term -- overall federal spending dropped from 23 percent of GDP to 21 percent. (Obama has taken the size of government to 25 percent of GDP.)
As for the budget deficit, Reagan left it around 3 percent of GDP -- almost exactly where he inherited it.
Overall, Reagan’s policies created 21 million new jobs as real GDP averaged 3.5 percent annually during the seven fat years of recovery. The unemployment rate dropped to 5.3 percent from 10.7 percent. The stock market rose nearly 200 percent. And household net worth expanded by $8 trillion.
Quintessentially, Mr. Reagan was a private-sector, free-enterprise man. His policies of low tax rates, lighter regulation, domestic-spending limits, and low inflation rescued the country from the malaise of stagflation. Meanwhile, his military build-up, tough diplomacy, and “evil empire” battle cry defeated Soviet communism. Reagan was an optimist, but a tough-minded one. He believed in American exceptionalism. He also fervently believed in freedom.
Since last November’s Tea Party election, Obama has read about Reagan, talked about Reagan, and very cautiously moved economic policy in the direction of Reagan. I am open-minded. Let’s hope the current president stays on his new Reagan path.
But let’s never forget: Ronald Reagan saved the country 30 years ago. He also saved our future. Hopefully Mr. Obama will learn from that.
It’s just spin. It’s a different twist on Clinton’s move to the center back in 1994. This time they’re trying to get mileage out of Reagan’s 100th. Eugene Robinson’s column in the Washington Post was even trying to redefine Reagan as more like Democrats to sell Obama spending policies. Is it possible that the democrats political machine, with liberal media in lockstep, will tilt the 2012 playing field so far as to make the Republican nominee run against the first black Reagan? Sounds absurd, but stranger things have happened?
Good point,a great person is who THEY are as defined by their own very real accomplishments, not someone else using borrowed metaphors and borrowed accomplishments. He does not think therefore he is not...he is not anybody, not even himself, having sacrificed an authentic individual self to the “group.” There is no “there” “there”. He is siimply a reflection of whatever works in the moment, sucking the blood of other people’s lives and accomplishments and seeing no reflection in the mirror. In other words, a vampire of sorts. So far Obama is: another Kennedy brother, FDR, Reagan. But he isn’t the first Black President because THAT was Clinton. Oh yeah, and Michelle is Jackie Kennedy. They are all crazy and very desperate to find something, anything authentically “them.” And this is the basic problem to all ideologies that are anti-individualistic or communalistic.
Good point,a great person is who THEY are as defined by their own very real accomplishments, not someone else using borrowed metaphors and borrowed accomplishments. He does not think therefore he is not...he is not anybody, not even himself, having sacrificed an authentic individual self to the “group.” There is no “there” “there”. He is siimply a reflection of whatever works in the moment, sucking the blood of other people’s lives and accomplishments and seeing no reflection in the mirror. In other words, a vampire of sorts. So far Obama is: another Kennedy brother, FDR, Reagan. But he isn’t the first Black President because THAT was Clinton. Oh yeah, and Michelle is Jackie Kennedy. They are all crazy and very desperate to find something, anything authentically “them.” And this is the basic problem to all ideologies that are anti-individualistic or communalistic.
To compare him to an American is ridiculous.....
lets go to fokelore. Islamic folklore
Obama is closer to Saladin
To suggest he is like any AMerican is about the same as suggesting you are Marilyn Monroe
For the liberals and bedwetters out there that may get upset that I compared Obama to a monkey, deal with it.
Obama = Reagan?
Yeah, sure, like:
a) Reagan hated CommunismSo 'Communism' is the only thing they have in common.
b) Obama loves Communism
This says it best.
“Obama is no Reagan”
0bama didn’t inherit the bad economy and the high unemployment from President Bush. The democrats; of which he was part of when he was in the Senate are to blame for the bad economy and the high unemployment rate. Remember, the economy was thriving and unemployment was practically nonexistent when the Republicans were in charge
You are almost right about the Moscow Olympics in 1980, but the peanut farmer from Georgia refused to let the entire US team to go to Moscow to participate in the Olympics
Excellent
You are right
But But But it must be so . .
He called himself the Gipper
in his fare thee well to Gibbs
Sorry Kaslin didn’t notice you had mentioned this earlier.
With all the pictures in this blog I somehow skipped over your previous mention.
Will the media pick up on the Gipper reference?
Maybe put it on cover of Time ?
Excellent research!
Amazing what Nov Midterms and a Tea Party can do to a guy.
"Voters, Obama is baptized in the fire of faith."
"Obama's been saved. Thank you, Jesus."
"Voters, let's hear an Alleluia and an Amen."
I think you misunderstand the writer. He himself is not comparing Reagan and Obama. He is finding fault with all those on the left who are making the comparison.
Yes. That was pretty good. Covered it all.
Or..."Obama's been saved. Allahu Akbar!"
I found two spelling versions of: 'Allahu'
I’m offended at the idiotic idea Zer0 and Reagan have anything in common.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.