I don't think so (google 'trump president') and the caller was right to question his donations based on lots of speculation that Trump will run for president in 2012 as a Republican. Based on that, Trump's donations to democrats are surely relevant and Rush's defense was based on Donald's business deals in Chicago, IOW, pay to play. How can Rush defend that?
I've been listening to Rush since 1992 but having that faggot sing at his wedding and then getting all chummy with him and his 'partner' was nauseating. But defending pay to play because it's his 'pal' is just wrong.
Then don’t listen. It matters not to me what you do with your time.
I’m not wasting another second on Trump. Whether he runs or not is completely irrelevent to me, as I said yesterday.
Glad you made a rare appearance on the thread just to let us know.