Oops. Try again, Accuracy In Media.
What do Dems think of the Blaze as it is affiliated with both Glenn Beck and the Huffington Post. Quite the conundrum for liberals eh?
Nachum: great minds ... here’s another article about this smoke-screen:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2688090/posts
At least now we know what it takes for AIM to engage in some serious in-depth analysis.
Okay, okay. You got 'im. Go ahead and take the money.
Reading the comments:
Joe Y:
“I have to disagree with you on your analysis. He says the “Republican(s)” voted for Obama because of the “Tea Party people.”
Not possible. The Tea Party movement didn’t begin until well after Obama took office. The “Republican(s)” would have voted against McCain, a moderate Republican who they would surely have been symapthetic with.
Outside of Palin, there was little in the way of conservative voice in that campaign, but Schiller claims the ambassador said, “…they think the current Republican party is not really the Republican Party. It’s been hijacked by this group…” Yet, Schiller never mentions Palin, and there was no Tea Party at the time, i.e. no “group” tht could have “hijacked” the McCain campaign.
Furthermore, Schiller refers specifically to the Tea Party in his description, and the Tea Party could not possilbly–not possibly–have been part of the conversation to which Schiller refers. No, when Schiller speaks, he’s giving his own evaluation.”
OldJoe:
“Let me get this straight, the Republicans…..”an ambassador — so, a very highly placed Republican — another person, who was one of the top donors to the Republican party.”, both voted for Obama because they knew about Tea Party which had not formed in November 2008?”
Rex:
“Let me get this straight, he repeated what he alledgedly heard from two republicans in order to support an opinion that he did not hold? That doesn’t sound accurate to me. That sounds like left wing spin.”
I didn’t know that the folks over at AIM could cogently write while entertaining gerbils into their back doors. I am impressed.
O’Keefe released the entire raw video.
Besides the worst bigotry was when the NPR thug said that the Jews owned the media.
Then Shiller should have fought it. But he didn’t. So, I have to believe that there is truth in the video. :)
When does CPB/NPR/state-run media ever do that?
There were 2 commies on CNN just now trying to claim NPR is not Liberal. Pathetic.
Ok, then why did he quit?
I’m glad to see Glenn’s site STANDING WITH THE TRUTH... which, has NO agenda.
Oops. Try again, Accuracy In Media.
Scottie: He’s dead, Jim.
It’s fairly clear from the full transcript that Schiller’s last words: “I mean, it’s pretty scary. They’re seriously racist, racist people.”, were his own thoughts, not a quotation from someone else.
THEN WHY DID HE RESIGN??
All this shows is that given enough time you can come up with a better answer...
Their initial reaction is what is the most telling
In fact, I have long contended that every conservative submitting to an interview with any of the MSM talking heads should make it a pre-condition that they have the absolute right to copy and publish any portions of the interview that the MSM talking heads leave on the cutting room floor.
It’s time we give NPR a FREEPING like they’ve never had before!!!
Comment on their story here:
So what? We’ve known for some time there’s lots of Democrats in the Republican party. We call ‘em RINOs.
My best guess is that Schiller is something like the stereotype of a used car salesman. He tells his guests whatever he thinks they want to hear and makes up stuff on a moment’s notice.
I kinda doubt the alleged conversation even occurred or that these GOP guys who confided in him even exist. Regardless, I dont think the blaze analysis is fair. It sounds like the “what the GOP guys told me” part ends with their claim to have voted for Obama.