The article on the NASA guy is extremely weak. He makes an offhand comment about the technology. Even says he doubts it is fusion, throwing cold water on that aspect of it. Nowhere does he say he’s going to “invest” in it as you say. Bushnell appears to be mainly overseeing climate projects. Yeah lots of credibility there.
The navy article is a little better, at least it shows there maybe something there. But it has to be replicated by an independent lab, of course. Plus nowhere does that prove you get more energy out than you have to put in.
But why argue? According to the inventors we’ll have a prototype up and running and cranking out the kilowatts by october.
So, sit back, have a nice summer! If greece has the world’s first fusion plant up and running by fall I will gladly congratulate you on this find. I just think it’s far more likely this fades into the sunset after a bunch of investors pour money into it, like has happened dozens of times before.
The article on the NASA guy is extremely weak.
***I think I’ll believe the chief scientist at NASA Langley as well as a few Nobel Prize winning Nuclear Physicists over you, today.
He makes an offhand
***Not quite, in fact it is rather pointed.
comment about the technology. Even says he doubts it is fusion,
***You obviously have no clue why. Let’s see, we have 2 Hydrogen atoms and they wixilicbpaicleinnionize into one Helium atom through the roundabout Widom-Larson theory or somesuch, but it’s definitely NOT fusion. Uh huh. This would have NOTHING to do with the fact that cold fusion has been dragged through the mud by the hot fusion boys for 20 years, nahhh...eyeroll... /s
throwing cold water on that aspect of it.
**It’s actually quite fun to watch you twist yourself into a pretzel.
Nowhere does he say he’s going to “invest” in it as you say.
***No, he just says it’s the number one contender for the future, we can fill in the blanks all we want.
Bushnell appears to be mainly overseeing climate projects. Yeah lots of credibility there.
***More credibility than you, shortpants.
The navy article is a little better, at least it shows there maybe something there.
***But that won’t stop you from being a naysayer, now, would it?
But it has to be replicated by an independent lab, of course.
***Already been done. Not that I would expect you to be current on this information.
Plus nowhere does that prove you get more energy out than you have to put in.
***That’s how we know you’re a naysayer, there’s always some aspect that you pick that isn’t covered in the paper. Let’s just ignore all the 14,000 other replications of excess heat, and focus on this one little piece of gnat shiite in this pile of pepper.
But why argue? According to the inventors we’ll have a prototype up and running and cranking out the kilowatts by october.
***And your point is?
So, sit back, have a nice summer! If greece has the world’s first fusion plant up and running by fall I will gladly congratulate you on this find.
***You’re a complete idiot. You would be the guy who watches Jesus rise from the grave and say, “good for you”. My approach is to see where I can make a better world and work it to my own benefit at the same time.
I just think it’s far more likely this fades into the sunset after a bunch of investors pour money into it, like has happened dozens of times before.
***Obviously that is a likely outcome. But you give us nothing in terms of more insight into the possibility one way or the other. Ignoring you is worth more as a result, because after reading all the folly you throw together, we are no further along the path than when we started. But we sure have a loudmouth naysayer with us on the trip, now. Like that’s worth something /s