Posted on 07/30/2011 12:41:19 PM PDT by Clairity
Global warming predictions have followed UN models and trends in describing how Earth traps heat due to carbon dioxide. The increased gases and rising temperatures would create large amounts of water vapors to develop into clouds. Those clouds would trap larger amounts of heat and devastate the planet's ecosystem leading to the end of mankind.
With new data collected from a NASA's Terra satellite, the previous model may be proven as a hoax. Hypothesis based on the satellite's findings show that planet Earth actually releases heat into space, more than it retains it. The higher efficiency of releasing energy outside of Earth contradicts former forecasts of climate change.
"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show...There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans," said Dr. Spencer.
(Excerpt) Read more at sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com ...
Scientific DATA shows that the climate change models predicting global warming due to human activity are WRONG.
Yet, even in the face of this latest evidence, the MSM is still promoting global warming and tries to suppress this data — no wonder Obama cut NASA’s budget./
Here are a couple of examples:
Skeptic’s Small Cloud Study Renews Climate Rancor
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=14192061
“A study on how much heat in Earth’s atmosphere is caused by cloud cover has heated up the climate change blogosphere even as it is dismissed by many scientists.”
This week in global-warming denial
Why is a questionable study from a controversial researcher overshadowing actual science?
http://www.salon.com/news/global_warming/?story=/news/feature/2011/07/29/global_warming
“July has been marked by an abundance of new evidence and arguments that point to the adverse effect of man-made climate change. But, surprisingly, it’s been a controversial study from a controversial scientist that has generated the most buzz. Unsurprisingly, a slew of prominent right-leaning websites are pointing to it as proof that global warming is a hoax.
The report, by University of Alabama scientist Roy Spencer and published in the peer-reviewed journal Remote Sensing, argues that heat is actually escaping from Earth much more quickly than current climate models predicted. This assessment, if accurate, could mean that the dramatically rising temperatures that scientists currently anticipate would not ultimately occur.”
No bias here, “just reporting the news”, right?
Oh NOES! Don’t you see? Not only are we warming mother Earth... we are now heating up the Universe! Woe is me!!! /sarc
Without an EPA permit?
|
If the earth didn’t release heat into space, it would always be warming here. The temperature would be a several trillion degrees farenheit.
The heat has to go somewhere.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2755085/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2755188/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2755188/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2756081/posts
If earth did not release heat, wouldn’t the sun eventually turn it into an Easy-Bake Brick?
Wait until the EPA classifies heat as a pollutant like they’ve done with CO2. LOL!
I was wondering why it gets so much colder at night when the clouds aren’t around! Who would have thought!!!!
More precisely, if heat didn’t release the Earth would be more like Venus...about 900F.
good links.
and it goes much further. temperature and tidal gauge records have been doctored (caught red-handed!)
Man causes a TINY amount of CO2. CO2 is a TINY amount of the atmosphere. and, it DOESN’T cause any net warming.
Chemical readings by NOBEL PRIZEWINNERS show it was higher in the 1800s than now!
if even ONE CO2 reading from last century is higher than now, the entire Hoax is revealed. yet there are, and some were made by Nobel Prize winners in Chemistry:
page 5 and 9, show overall CO2:
180 Years accurate CO2 - Gasanalysis of Air
by Chemical Methods (Short version)
http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/180_years_accurate_Co2_Chemical_Methods.pdf
and this one is a good sample of the fraud:
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/hiding-the-decline-in-washington-dc/
and in addition, to altering 100 year old daa, making them COLDER to increase the warming trend, they have also falsified sea-level data:
Changing Tides: Research Center Under Fire for Adjusted Sea-Level Data (The hoax continues)
Fox News ^ | 6/17/2011 | Maxim Lott
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2736328/posts
That Al Gore! I’m telling you, he is a “Fart young smeller.”
I never thought that the release of energy into space was a contraversial issue. Regardless of the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, the rate of energy leaving the earth, on average, will be nearly exactly equal to the amount of energy in incident solar radiation + neglible amounts from nuclear reactions, fossile fuel burning and geothermal leakage. What we arguing about is the equilibrium point (temperature) here on earth.
LOL! Hopefully they aren’t reading this thread! LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.