Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

So they’re using Hubble to get a view of Pluto, but the pictures leave much to be desired. I understand optics enough to understand how they could see so far away, but why couldn’t terrestrial multi-optic telescopes get a really clear view of Pluto from here? For that matter, why can’t Hubble or other high-powered scopes get better, closer, clearer views of planets in our solar system? It seems we’re creating scopes that can see farther and farther out, but we can’t get close-up, high-resolution images of plants in our own solar system.


14 posted on 07/17/2012 6:48:58 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia

They move.........


15 posted on 07/17/2012 7:38:44 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: rarestia
So they’re using Hubble to get a view of Pluto, but the pictures leave much to be desired.

After several thousand years of civilization, they are the best images ever acquired.

Pluto is difficult to image because it is small, very far away, and light intensity follows the inverse square law.

17 posted on 07/17/2012 8:24:42 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson