[wizard61]

“You know when you’re attempting to do good by voting for the lesser of two evils. You’re still essentially voting for evil.”

There has never been a perfect candidate for any office in the history of earth.

I agree that there is a point where I’d rather have Obama instead of a fake Conservative, but it is ALWAYS a lesser of two evils.

[MrEdd]

No one is suggesting a candidate has to be perfect, rather it is being pointed out to you that when a candidate gets too far to the left, it is better to vote for an imperfect but right wing candidate that is not the nominee rather than the leftist if that person is the nominee.

Tell us all wizard, if you have been out of a job eighteen months and food is running out...there are no jobs to be had and in fact places are closing down... are YOU going to bash your wife and daughters head in with a sledge hammer before you jump off a bridge, or are you going to lock them in the attic and set the house on fire before you jump off a bridge?

That question is no more asinine than the one you ask, and after all, you have no perfect way to pay the bills. Since you have no perfect way, you have to take one of the choices I offered, since no way is perfect.

The proper way to deal with Hegelian triangulation is to give it the ridicule it properly deserves.