“... that proves the dominant controller of temperatures in the Earth’s atmosphere is due to galactic cosmic rays and the sun, rather than by man.”
I have read summaries of the article. I think this overstates the conclusions in the article quite a bit.
It would be interesting to read the article itslef instead of this summary.
Temperatures can change twenty degrees in a normal day. It's the sun.
You can be sure that the editors of Nature forced the authors to word the article to minimize the "damage" to the AGW meme. There has already been a lot of talk on climate skeptics blogs (Watts Up With That, DrRoySpencer.com) about that. IOW, the article was deliberately written to UNDERSTATE those conclusions.
I can’t even find the link to the original article anywhere. It doesn’t seem to be on the Nature website. Can anyone else find the article? Or even a link to the real abstract?